Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Typically, I compile the New Years logos from the various search engines and search industry on New Years Day, but most of the search engines, with the exception of Google, have the logos out already. So here are the 2010 New Years logos. If any of them update and when Google adds there logo, I will update this post.
Google:
Yahoo (Animated):
Yahoo (Static):
Bing:
AOL:
Ask.com:
DogPile:
Baidu:
Clicker:
Sogou:
Zuula:
Cre8asite Forums:
Search Engine Roundtable (that's us):
For the past year's logos, see: New Years 2009, New Years 2008, New Years 2007, Google's 2006 logo, Search Engine Roundtable's 2006 logo, Ask's 2005 logo, and Cre8asite's 2005.
Forum discussion currently at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, Bing Forums, HighRankings Forums, Google Webmaster Help, WebmasterWorld and Cre8asite Forums.
Update: Remember the I'm Feeling Lucky Google Countdown feature? Well, at midnight, when you click it, this is what it looks like: Via websonic.nl...
Almost exactly like last year, Google is pushing out a New Years PageRank Update now. Mid-December we reported PageRank shifts or penalties and today, there are wide spread reports of a PageRank update in the Google Toolbar.
It is a bit funny, because last New Years, we reported in mid-December a PR shuffle and then on December 31, 2008 we reported an official PageRank update in the toolbar. It is almost exactly the same way this year. Today, December 31, 2009, we are reporting the 2010 New Years PageRank update.
The last toolbar PageRank update before today was in October. Like I always say, Toolbar PageRank is not of great use to SEOs. It is often months out of date and does not determine a rank of a web page. So please do not obsess over Toolbar PageRank.
For those who saw their toolbar PageRank go up, congrats on the 'badge' and here is to an even higher PR in 2010!
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld, Google Webmaster Help, Search Engine Watch Forums and DigitalPoint Forums.
Sphinn announced they are closing the site to submissions from 5:00 pm PT on December 31st through about 9:00 am PT on Monday, January 4th.
Matt McGee, the Sphinn Editor, explained the reason for them taking down the submissions capability:
Over the Christmas weekend, we found that just about the only things being submitted to Sphinn were spam. Since we're expecting the New Year's weekend to be similar, we've decided to just turn the submission form off for a few days.
Also, it means - just relax - enjoy the down time and rest up for an awesome 2010! Easier said then done, eh?
Forum discussion at Sphinn.
In an updated Google Maps Help thread, Joel H. from Google said Google has dropped most of the local results in the Google web search pages for SEO and Web Design related queries. Yes, you heard me right - Google has decided to intentionally not show a local pack for queries that are related to SEO or web design and include a local qualifier. Example searches include [web design 10010], [web design suffern], [seo 90210], [new york seo companies] and so on.
Google first removed web designers from the local pack in November. Then they claimed it was a bug related to a fix for an Orlando Dodge dealership, but that is not true, according to Joel.
Yesterday, Joel from Google said:
Earlier thread, Brian (BB- baseonballs) [a Googler, btw] noted that this may be related to a known issue regarding the display of local search results on google.com. After further investigation, they are slightly different, and I'll explain our intent.Today, we're intentionally showing less local results for web design / SEO queries. For example, [web design sacramento] doesn't display local listings today. We believe this is an accurate representation of user intent. In some cases, we do show local listings, however (as NSNA/php-er noted) [web design in bellingham]. I'm sure some of you feel we should be displaying local results for queries like [Web Design Vancouver]. I understand that concern, but based on our understanding of our users, we feel this is the right decision for now.
I'll give the usual disclaimer that we're constantly working on improving the user experience and results will vary over time. So, this could change in the future, but I wanted to be explicit about what we're doing today.
Yea, Joel said that. Of course, the logical thoughts by SEOs on this matter is that Google really does hate SEOs. This may be the last Google vs. SEOs controversy of 2009.
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
A HighRankings Forum thread asks an interesting SEO question. The question is, can you optimize for stop words in Google or other search engines?
His particular example seems flawed, in that he is calling IT a stop word and it is stopping him for optimizing for the query [it companies]. However, when I search for [it companies] in Google, it does seem to figure out, IT here stands for information technology.
But in general, is there a need to optimize for stop words? Do we have more examples of cases? If so, can it be done?
Here is a poll:
Can you SEO for stop words?(polls)
Forum discussion at HighRankings Forum.
Update: See Jill's comment below for the issue this SEO has in the thread.
There is an excellent thread at HighRankings Forum on the topic of how you should or could track one's link building efforts. The topic in this thread started off about how to track links accrued due to a link building contest. However, the topic moved into how to track link building efforts for a site in general.
Many are of the opinion that no tool can accurately measure the links acquired over time. Google Webmaster Tools, Yahoo Site Explorer and the various other tools, to many, are not that accurate. As Rosemary said in the thread, "one month Yahoo would show 10,000 inbound links and the next month only 300." It is hard to rely on tools that you don't know how it works and when there is a bug, you cannot fix it yourself.
Others say that when they build links, they store the information in a spreadsheet to report back to the client. I have seen this done. I am a firm believer that if you are hiring a link building company, they should provide you with an organized means of knowing what links they acquired for you, from where and when they acquired them. I have said this before, so I say it again.
Others in the thread said they just gave up on collecting and monitoring this data.
How do you track your back links?
Forum discussion at HighRankings Forum.
Mike reported how Google likes you to report Google Maps business listing spam to them. Google Maps, especially the local business center, has been a target for spammers in the past couple years. Google has tried numerous ways to have people report spam to them.
I guess recently, Google changed it to ask people to report a problem with the business listing via the "report a problem" link either on the map itself or on the business's place page. As Mike said, Maps Guide Cecelia noted that the "time frame [for spam removal] most likely varies based on the number of reports we receive."
To report spam on a business's places page, you go to the "more info" link on the search results of that listing and then click on the "more" link. The more link will open up options, such as "report a problem":
After you click the "report a problem" link, a form pops up asking for more information:
Forum discussion at Sphinn.
Those of you who are patiently waiting for Google to fix the verification tag in the Webmaster Tools API for the past two months just has to wait a bit longer.
In short, those who are tying to use the Webmaster Tools API to verify their sites with Google Webmaster Tools are running into issues. The reason is, the meta tag being generated via the API is wrong and needs to be updated by Google. This has been going on since October 2009.
Dennis G. from Google promised he will finally update it to work in January, sometime. He said:
We've partly updated the API already. The rest will be fixed in January. Sorry for the delay.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.
Conduct a search for [blackberry news] (Note: I wouldn't click on those results, they may infect your computer) in Google and see page two and three of the results. The results are inundated with weird results from random domains that redirect to CNN.com. The redirect is a 302 redirect and the header looks like:
HTTP/1.1 302 => Date => Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:58:52 GMT Content-Type => text/html Connection => close Server => Apache Content-Length => 0 Location => http://cnn.com
Here is a picture of just two of those results:
For a full page of results, see this screen capture.
Now, I do not know much about hijacking search results in Google. I know this was somewhat of a major issue in 2005. Then in 2008, we reporting page hijacking wasn't an issue in Google anymore, until about six months ago, when it popped up again.
So maybe this is a new example of a 302 hijack attempt. This time targeting the popular news source, CNN and going after the keyword phrase [blackberry news]?
Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
I was searching for a logo of a company, I searched Google Images for [compucall logo] and I was presented with an AdWords ad, but one of those product image ads. Google began allowing these ads a few months back, they are called product image ads in AdWords.
But what stood out was that this image was of a woman in thong underwear. Here is a picture:
I wonder what type of click through rate this ad gets?
I wonder if Google has a policy against these types of images on their search pages? I don't really see anything in the Google FAQs on these product extensions, but I can be missing it.
Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.
A search in Google for [movie: nine nyc] directs you to a Google Movie results page. It shows you the typical movie theaters in that area and movie times, as you would expect. However, it also shows "Showtimes for September 11 attacks" in the blue bar under the search box.
That, to me, is incredibly weird. Here is a picture:
Also, others are reporting a search in Google for [movie: nine ny] directs you to a Google Movie results page. It shows you the typical movie theaters in that area and movie times, as you would expect. However, it also shows "Showtimes for US Airways Flight 1549" in the blue bar under the search box.
The US Airways Flight was the one that safely emergency landed in the Hudson River in New York.
I am not sure why these weird, cryptic messages are coming up in Google Movie search.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
Five years after launching the Google Advertising Professional program, Google is giving users a way to search and find these professionals.
Tim Cohn first spotted this, a new page Google launched named Google Advertising Professionals Search beta. You can basically plug in some variables, such as monthly spend, location and type of AdWords related help you are looking for and hit search.
Here is a screen capture:
I covered this yesterday at Search Engine Land and one person found the search to be poor, an advertiser said he already got a lead from this feature.
Note: Google has not really publicized the feature yet - so hopefully Google will place this feature in the for front of where customers would look for it.
Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.
A Google Webmaster Help thread, written in Italian, has confirmed reports of a bug between Google's Blogger and Google Webmaster Tools.
Dennis G. from the Google Webmaster Team, who is specifically involved in the verification process, wrote in a Google Webmaster Help thread:"
It looks like we have a bug in our blogger integration. I'll go fix that. In the meanwhile, try verifying by meta tag instead.
It seems like he is the man that actually goes in to fix the "bug." How cool is that?
In any event, if you are having problems verifying your Blogger blog with Google Webmaster Tools, know that you are not alone.
There is no ETA for the fix, but Dennis made it sound like it is a quick fix.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.
Whenever an SEO talks about geo-targeting your site to a specific region, so it ranks well on that localized version of Google they tell you to do a few things.
(1) Host in the country you want to rank well for
(2) Try to use a ccTLD for that country, i.e. domain.co.uk for UK
(3) Set the geographic target in Google Webmaster Tools
However, instead of using a ccTLD, I often see sites deploy a subdomain or subfolder to specify a different language or geographic target. A ccTLD is best, in my opinion. Of course, there are times you want to use a localized language by target the main Google - so that does apply.
JohnMu from Google replied to a Google Webmaster Help thread stating that a ccTLD is much more powerful than hosting your site on a server in that country. Specifically, John said:
Yes, we do try to find context from these two factors (I think this article is being updated to be a bit more clear though :-)) -- however, if your site has a geographic TLD/ccTLD (like .co.nz) then we will not use the location of the server as well. Doing that would be a bit confusing, we can't really "average" between New Zealand and the USA... At any rate, if you are using a ccTLD like .co.nz you really don't have to worry about where you're hosting your website, the ccTLD is generally a much stronger signal than the server's location could ever be.
Google will use the ccTLD over the server location to geotarget your site. This makes sense to me, but I do not think this has been covered here. We covered the overal topic dozens of times, but not specifically which factor is more important.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.
Everyone talks about how liberal Google is and how it may bias their objectivity in the search results and their other agendas. But every day, I check the Google News Forum and see complaints from "liberals" that Google News shows Fox News, a very conservative news source, in the Google News search results and home page. The more I see the complaints, the more I see that Google is not politically bias in their search results.
Just take a quick scan of the Google News Forum and see how many complaints there are about Fox News being included:
I find it a bit comical to be honest. I did think it would be nice to give searchers an option about how liberal or conservative they want the news to be. I asked they create a liberal & conservative news slider control that allows users to adjust how liberal or conservative the news gets. Of course, if Google did that, they would have to label each news source as liberal/conservative or pick up words on a page that make a news source liberal or conservative. That can get a bit hairy.
I just thought I point out the daily activity in this Google News Forum.
Forum discussion at Google News Forum.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
I've been holding on this topic for after the holiday break. A new and long WebmasterWorld thread has great discussion over the topic of AdWords advertisers being afraid to make change to their accounts. Why are they afraid? Well, they are afraid of being banned or their Quality Score dropping where they cannot compete and so on.
So what do they do? They slowly die out. As one advertiser explained:
We are afraid to do anything. We are not adding ads. We are not taking advantage of the new stuff google is offering. We just delete ads as they drop in QS. We are paralyzed and slowly dying.
The thread moved into the discussion of how Google treats affiliates in the AdWords space. Now, we discussed that often and maybe only affiliates feel paralyzed in AdWords, I am not sure. But I wanted to get a good feel from the AdWords advertiser base, if you feel this way also.
Please take my poll: AdWords Advertiser: Do You Feel Paralyzed?
AdWords Advertiser: Do You Feel Paralyzed?(surveys)
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A WebmasterWorld thread and an older Bing Forums thread has discussion from webmasters over the issue of Microsoft Bing's web crawler, MSNBot, crawling file names that do not exist on a specific site.
This reminders me of the ongoing issue of Bing creating fake referrals in webmaster log files. This has been going on for years, where Microsoft claims they have fixed it, but never really has.
In this specific case, it seems like Bing is creating file names on a specific site to crawl. Wel, they are not creating files, just trying to fetch pages that do not and never have existed on a specific site. I am not sure if this is a Bing issue or a webmaster issue.
A long time WebmasterWorld member explained the issue:
In what is apparently a rather old bad behavior, msnbot has a practice of regularly requesting totally manufactured URIs that appear to be designed to trigger 404 errors. Here are two sample log entries of the two styles of bogus URIs msnbot requests:
'65.55.207.126'¦Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:39:49 -0500¦'msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)'¦'*/*'¦'/ADBF3C7AB534E8356F30D8AC05291640_00000.temp019f.html'¦''
'65.55.207.28'¦Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:46:22 -0500¦'msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)'¦'*/*'¦'/000166709_00001.temp00be.html'¦''The requests ALWAYS take on one of the formats above starting with either a 32byte GUID or a nine digit integer.
In the Bing thread, another person said:
For many many years, msnbot has been crawling my sites looking for files that have never existed... i'm trying to figure out why...
the filenames have changed slightly in recent times but they have been similar in structure since the beginning... they are something like 000092601_00002.temp0001.htm... in other words, 9 numbers underscore 5 numbers dot temp 4 numbers dot htm... the search for these is all over my server's directory tree...I'll emphasize once more that these files have never existed on my site and i have no clue how msnbot may have picked them up...
Honestly, I feel bad that I am always beating up on Microsoft. I know they are new to the game, when you compare them to Google. But I have to report these issues.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld & Bing Forums.
Sherri Davidoff posted an article named Our Google Government after seeing one of those Google Docs ads on a site. The ad reads, "Over 60% of the U.S. state governments have gone Google." Here is a picture of it:
Of course this worries many, including myself. But you have to understand that while maybe 60% of the U.S state government has "gone Google" it doesn't mean that the U.S.'s most sensitive data is on Google's servers. It is possible that some small government offices have switched to Google Apps for email or document management. But to house sensitive intelligence on a hosted Google owned server? That has not happened.
How am I so sure? Well, I am not. But I recently watched a 60 minute show (or something like it, I forget, it was a few months back), which was about how countries are hacking into other countries to steal intel and money from each other. One of the concerns was using Google to host the information. A top government official said that while many governments use Google for everyday use, the most sensitive information is stored on government built and maintained hardware and software.
In fact, the official said that they cannot trust hardware or chips made in some countries because they have seen cases where those chips actually are programmed to secretly send over data from the computer to a remote location. So to trust Google with that information, simply doesn't make sense. And that is what the official said. It costs the government a lot more than it would if they outsourced it to Google, but in some cases, it is not about saving money.
Of course, some U.S. offices might receive sensitive information in their Google hosted applications. And the risk of that increases daily as more data is sent back and forth and more offices "go Google." But this all needs to be kept in perspective.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A WebmasterWorld thread has discussion around getting Google to index a popular image feature sites use to show off images on their web site. It is called Lightbox JS and it basically uses JavaScript to open up a neat larger view of the image on the page.
I use it on many sites, but you can see a quick example on the RustyBrick Mobile Portfolio. Just click on the image and it opens up a larger picture of that image. Here is a screen capture showing the larger image as it overlays on top of the page:
The issue is, GoogleBot is having a tough time capturing these images in their index. WebmasterWorld administrator, Tedster, explained:
I've been up against the same challenge. Even though regular Google search is aggressively discovering URLs and content by spidering JavaScript, apparently the image bot is not so inquisitive at this point. This surprised me, because there are many images being displayed through Lightbox scripts these days.
Yes, GoogleBot is able to execute JavaScript, but is GoogleImageBot able to at the same pace?
Tedster is exploring other ways to get GoogleBot to index Lightbox JS. He tried the following method, but it doesn't seem to work:
My latest attempt involves making the anchor part of the link a thumbnail image - but the thumbnail is not just a smaller version of the larger image. I use the same exact image file for the anchor, but I resize it on the the page with the HTML width and height attributes. This means that the page loads more slowly, but at least the image bot gets a direct <img src=[url]> style mark-up.
If you have a solution, let us know.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A DigitalPoint Forums thread reports that a search on (beware before you click) [cricket talks] in Google Image search returns a pornographic image. It happens both on standard safe search and strict safe search, but goes away completely when you turn off the safe search feature.
Here is a picture, which I cropped a bit to show the result here:
I personally see the image on the 3rd row when strict search is on and the second row when safe search is in standard or moderate mode.
What is interesting is that it is hosted on a pretty bad domain, i.e. asianteenmovieslesbiananal.info. OpenDNS for me blocks the domain due to the domain and network containing pornography and nudity. I guess Google got mixed up with this one.
On a related note, a Google News Help thread reports that Google News had an image of a PlayBoy teaser on their most viewed section. I personally did not see it, but it would not have been the first time seductive or nude images showed up on the front page of Google News.
Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums & Google News Help.
Merry Christmas everyone! This week at the Search Engine Roundtable was a fairly slow week, due to the holidays. Some of the news I wanted to cover includes that Googlers are working on Christmas. Also, I posted the Christmas logos and themes from Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask.com, Baidu, and so many others - so check it out. Google sent out e-cards saying they will be giving $20 million in charity in exchange for sending out schwag to advertisers and publishers. Brett Tabke felt we got stiffed and was pretty upset. Brett later explained he feels Google is cutting on webmaster and advertiser support and relations. Also, Bing really has zero support for the canonical tag and I explained why that upset me. QuickMark QR scanner fixed their bug, which caused a major headache for Google's favorite places decals. That was this week at the Search Engine Roundtable - Merry Christmas!
Make sure to subscribe to our video feed or subscribe directly on iTunes to be notified of these updates and download the video in the background. Here is the YouTube version of the feed:
For the original iTunes version, click here or to see the YouTube version in higher quality, click play & hit "HD."
Search Topics of Discussion:
Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!
Merry Christmas! Although I have about five items to write about today, I figured I hold off on them until Monday. Trust me, I know how it is to be swamped and buried in feeds and news to catch up on while I am celebrating a Jewish holiday - so I will spare you all. Plus, I finally am making the move to Google Chrome, using Chromium on my Mac - so it is nice to take it slow to get up to speed on it.
If you are reading today, make sure to check out our Christmas logos for 2009, which I just updated this morning to add several more logos from other search engines. In short, there are logos from Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask.com, and many others - so check it out.
In addition, I caught Googlers working on Christmas again. For the past few years, I have caught Googlers helping webmasters in the forums. This year is no different. JohnMu from Google posted in at least two threads on Christmas eve. One was the Merry Christmas Google thread and the other was a more technical webmaster question. Googlers did the same in 2008, 2007 and 2006. They also worked on New Years last year and the year before.
Finally, I will be working on my weekly search video recap today. Expect it to go live later today and you can watch (or just listen to) it at your leisure.
Merry Christmas and in our tradition, forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, Cre8asite Forums, Google Toolbar Help, HighRankings Forums, WebmasterWorld, DigitalPoint Forums, Google Maps Help, Google AdWords Help & Google Webmaster Help.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
There is this old and upsetting thread in the Bing Forums about how Bing handles the canonical tag. The thread is filled with misinformation. Matt McGee's post at Search Engine Land a week ago says it clearly.
Bing says it's still working on supporting the canonical tag on a single domain, and suggests webmasters should rely on other means to manage duplicate content.
You got that right, 11 months ago, Google, Yahoo and Bing announced support for the Canonical tag. As far as I know, only Google really uses it and they even added cross domain canonical support this month. Where is Bing at this? Well, in the next several months they hope to support a single domain use of the canonical tag and hopefully soon after the cross domain support. So it would have taken Bing over a year since they announced support of this tag to actually support it?
I am not too upset about that, to be honest. What I am more upset about is that official Bing support representatives are pretty much lying in the Bing Forums. Brett Yount, the Product Manager of Bing Webmaster Center said:
accourding to our blog post, http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/webmaster/archive/2009/02/12/partnering-to-help-solve-duplicate-content-issues.aspx, the canonical tag is used as a hint only.
No, it is not used as a hint or anything. It is not used period, not yet. Maybe in four months, but not yet.
Forum discussion at Bing Forums.
As a continuation of Brett Tabke calling out Google for stiffing webmasters over the Christmas gift this year, Brett explains more of why he is a bit upset with Google in 2009. Brett lays out what he believes Google is moving towards and it seems to really upset him and other webmasters. Brett explained:
Brett said "Everything Google has done in the last year has screamed, 'AdSense and AdWords markets are maximized or tapped out. Put it into maintenance mode and lets go see where else we can make money.'"
Is it true? Well, Google only held one Webmaster Chat session this year, which was last month, before that, in 2008 and 2007, they held tons of these. It seems like Google limited their sponsorship of conferences in 2009, including not sponsoring PubCon and did limited sponsorships for SMX and SES events this past year (i.e. sponsored sessions) I believe. I also know they cut back on sending representatives to shows, but I do not know the extent of that. They have cut AdWords rep support, laid off temp workers, did not hold the annual Google Dance, cut gifts in exchange of the donations they give anyway, and so on.
However, I did notice a step up in the support forums. They upgraded the support forum software (slowly) and added representatives to them. They added features to Webmaster Tools, posted a ton on the Webmaster Blog, Matt produced tons of support videos and so on. So it does seem like overall, they may have spent a lot less money on webmaster/advertiser relations and focused on the less expensive routes. 2009 was a recession for many businesses, but was Google recession proof? Should they have not made these cuts? I am not really to judge.
I do believe Google will be sending more reps to conferences this year, and that they are less concerned about the economy in 2010 then they were in 2009. Maybe sponsorship of events will grow in 2010? Maybe the Google Dance will come back? Maybe?
I hate to judge how other companies use their money. 2009 was an extremely tough year for many businesses. It seemed to us that Google sailed through the year with no problems at all. But who knows what decisions they made early on to help with that? This is a very sensitive topic but being that Google is a public company, I guess these questions can be asked.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A search for [dreadlocks] sports one of those Google definitions links at the top right of the page that leads to an 'offensive' categorization of those who have dreadlocks as their hairstyle. The Google Definition of dreadlocks uses it in a sentence as, "He was turned down for a driving job when he refused to cut his dreadlocks."
Now one person takes offense to this and posted his dissatisfaction in a Google Web Search Help forum. He wrote:
While it's true that this kind of thing (unfortunately) does happen, is it crazy to anyone else to be in a dictionary? It'd be like having the definition for Asian American being "He was turned down for the driving job because he was Asian American."
Here is a picture of the definition:
If Google stayed with Answers.com as their definitions provider, they might not be taking flack for this.
Personally, I find these types of posts funny - which is why I am highlighting this one.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
Merry Christmas Search Engine Roundtable readers! I believe most of the search engines have their special logos or themes live today. They include a handful of logos from Google, an animated logo from Yahoo, an awesome picture from Bing, a sweet Ask.com theme, DogPile's fun dress up and more from the industry.
Google began their logo blitz on the first day of Winter. While, we had Winter themes from YouTube, Bing and others, Google started with "the holidays." Calling it "The Holidays" made some Christians upset, mostly those in the U.K. Also, Google did not have a Chanukah logo like Bing or Ask did.
In any event, here are pictures of the Christmas logos, but this time I will end with Google, since they have so many:
Yahoo (animated) Christmas logo:
Yahoo (static) Christmas logo:
Bing's Christmas Theme:
Ask.com's Christmas Theme:
DogPile's Christmas Theme:
Baidu's Christmas Logo:
Quintura's Christmas Logo:
Clicker Christmas Logo:
Sogou Christmas Logo:
FriendFeed Christmas logo:
Zuula Christmas Logo:
BruceClay Christmas Logo:
Cre8asite Christmas Logo:
Search Engine Roundtable Christmas Theme:
Google's Christmas / Holiday Logos (so far four):
I'll update this post when I find more logos from the search industry.
For the past year's holiday and Christmas logos, see our posts from 2008, the 2007 logos, plus Google's five logos, 2006 logos, Cre8asite in 2005, also '05 Search Engine Roundtable and '05 Google, Yahoo and Ask, plus we have 2004 and some of 2003 archived for you.
Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, Cre8asite Forums, Google Toolbar Help, HighRankings Forums, WebmasterWorld, DigitalPoint Forums, Google Maps Help, Google AdWords Help & Google Webmaster Help.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
A few weeks ago, I was the first to report about Google decals going to wrong places and then we saw a flood of people complaining about the issue.
It turns out that the primary iPhone app recommended by Google for scanning these decals was made by QuickMark. QuickMark had a bug that was introduced just about the time these decals came out. The bug impacted where users were taken after they scanned a QR code.
The bug was fixed yesterday and it now works perfectly for me. The bug fixes included:
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.
Yesterday we reported that Google donated $20 million to charity instead of giving out their typical holiday gifts to publishers. We initially thought Google would not send out gifts this year, and we were somewhat right. They did not give publishers, advertisers or webmasters anything really - outside of what they earned.
Brett Tabke, the owner of WebmasterWorld, commented in a WebmasterWorld thread with his true feelings. He felt Google stiffed webmasters, advertisers and publishers this year. Let me quote him:
Lets get real. A $20m tax write off to charity has nothing to do with AdSense or AdWords swag gifts. If you were expecting a gift from Google - you got stiffed. Your "gift" did not go to charity. If it did go to charity in your name, then ask Google for documentation to that effect so that you can take it off your taxes. To even mention the two in the same breath is a disservice to the charities and to AdSense operators. Google gives money every year to charity - so do alot of businesses. $20 million isn't even good pocket changes to google. These two events are totally unrelated. Nothing but political pr slight-of-hand at work.
Do you agree with this?
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Last night I received an email from Google about a new feature available in my AdSense account, as a beta. The feature basically allows me to search for ads that are targeted towards my site. Searching for ads makes it a bit easier to find and block or allow these ads from being shown on my pages.
Here is a picture of the new feature:
Here is a copy of the email:
Subject: Announcing Search in the AdSense Ad Review Center
Hello,
As a beta tester of the new AdSense interface, you'll soon be able to use the Ad Review Center to search for ads that are targeted to your site. This new search functionality is designed to improve your efficiency when finding ads to review, based on feedback we've received from publishers.
To start searching for ads, sign in to your AdSense account. If you're presented with the previous interface, click the "Try new AdSense" link in the upper right-hand corner. Then, visit the "Allow & block ads" tab. You'll find the "Search ads" link in the left-hand navigation bar, where you can search by keyword text or ad URL. Learn more about search in our Help Center at http://www.google.com/adsense/support/as/bin/answer.py?answer=167309.
We invite you to provide us with your feedback about this new beta feature, using the 'Provide feedback' link in the upper right-hand corner of your account. Thanks in advance for your input, and we look forward to incorporating your suggestions into this new feature.
Sincerely,
The Google AdSense Team
The feature doesn't seem to work fully for me yet, but I suspect it to be very useful for many publishers once it goes fully live.
Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.
The Google support representatives posted several threads in the various categories of forums. Each of the forum categories have their own frequently asked questions. So the FAQs are broken down by Can't See My Ad, Ad Position & Performance, Campaign Management, Ad Approvals & Policy, Billing & Payments, Analytics & Conversion Tracking and miscellaneous.
I figured it would be nice to document them all in one place, so here they are:
1. I see that my ad is accruing clicks and impressions. But when I search for it , I can't find it! What should I do?
Such situations are due to the dynamic nature of our ad serving system. For this reason, what you see may, sometimes, not be representative of what most other users see. Try searching for your ad using our ad preview page. This page will show your ads the way most users see them, without accruing any additional impressions for your ads.
2. I want to know about first page bids.
On your Keyword Analysis page, you'll see a metric labeled 'Estimated bid to show on the first page' or displayed in your keyword table's 'Status' column. This metric, also called the 'first page bid estimate,' approximates the cost-per-click (CPC) bid needed for your ad to reach the first page of Google search results when a search query exactly matches your keyword. However, meeting your first page bid is not a guarantee of placement. Ad placement will still depend on Quality Score, your cost-per-click (CPC) bid, your budget and account settings, and user and advertiser behavior.
3. My keywords show ‘Active: Ads show rarely due to low Quality Score’ in the status column. What does this mean?
This means that your keyword is rarely triggering ads due to its low Quality Score. In this instance, we recommend visiting your Keyword Analysis page for more insight into the keyword's performance. Then, follow our optimization tips to improve the keyword's Quality Score. This will help the keyword's ad position and allow it to accrue more traffic.
4. Is there a tool that can help me identify the reason why my ad may not be showing?
The Ads Diagnostic Tool can identify why a particular ad or group of ads may not be showing. In those cases where an ad isn't shown, this tool recommends steps to help you get your ads up and running. In some cases, you may see more than one reason why your ad isn't appearing.
5. I've just started on my AdWords account, and my ads are not running. Why?
If your ads have been reviewed and approved to run, it is most probable that your account is going through a periodic review. Account reviews are designed for your protection and to maintain the quality of AdWords. To confirm, please contact AdWords support.
1. My ad has been disapproved for Inaccurate Display URL. What does that mean?
This means that you have violated our policy on inaccurate display URLs. If your destination URL is too long for your ad, use a shortened version - such as your homepage - that meets the character limit for this field. Edit your display URL to match your destination URL and save your ad which will automatically submit your ad back to us for review.
2. How will I know about my ads approval status?
When you submit a new ad or edit an existing ad, the ad will be immediately queued for review by AdWords Specialists and will be reviewed shortly. If your ad is disapproved, you will receive an email from us. You can opt out of receiving these emails by updating your email preferences in the 'Account Preferences' section of the 'My Account' tab.
3. What are the display URL guidelines?
The display URL for each AdWords ad is limited to 35 characters. If this character limit prevents you from displaying the actual URL of your site in your ad, consider using a shortened version of your URL, such as your homepage. Also, your display URL must be an actual web address, appearing in the form of a valid URL. It must include the extension (such as .com, .net, .org, etc.). It doesn't need to include the prefix (such as http:// or www). You can review our guidelines at http://adwords.google.com/select/guidelines.html.
4. What is one domain per ad group policy?
Per this policy, we no longer allow multiple display URL domains within a single ad group. All display URLs within an ad group must have the same top-level domain. This policy applies to all advertisers, regardless of previous acceptability of any ad groups. While we understand there are legitimate use-cases for multiple display URL domains within one ad group, advertisers must use separate ad groups for each domain.
5. What does unacceptable content mean?
Google believes strongly in freedom of expression and therefore offers broad access to content across the web without censoring search results. At the same time, Google may refuse any ads or terminate any of your ad campaigns at any time, for any reason, as noted in our program Terms and Conditions. Google AdWords reserves the right to refuse to run certain ads or categories of ads on a case-by-case basis. Ads disapproved for Unacceptable Content need to remove this content from the ad text and site. Once done, an AdWords Specialist can review ads again.
For more information on our Content Policies, do visit: https://adwords.google.com/select/contentpolicy.html.
1. I have a technical issue with my account while I attempt to perform an action. What should I do?
As a first step of troubleshooting, please try clearing your cache and cookies. If you are still facing difficulty after clearing cache and cookies, please write in to AdWords support with a screenshot of the error page or the screen and the detailed steps that you have taken.
2. How do I edit, pause, delete, or resume my ads?
You can edit, pause, delete, or resume one ad at a time, or you can change many ads at once. Changing the actual ad (such as editing text or uploading a new image) is the same as deleting the original ad and creating a new one, so after editing the ad, its statistics will be reset to zero. The same is true when you move an ad to another ad group.
3. How many campaigns/ads/keywords I can upload in my account? (or) Why am I unable to add more campaigns/ads in my account?
You may not be able to upload more campaigns/ads in your account if you have exceeded your account limits. Follow the tips to structure your account so that you will not exceed your limits.
4. I am an AdWords customer, however, why is my website not appearing in the left hand side(organic) search results in Google? It used to be there earlier, but now I do not see my website indexed. Please help.
Google's advertising programs are independent of our search results. Participation in AdWords and AdSense doesn't affect inclusion or ranking in the Google search index.
5. How do I add, edit, or delete keywords?
You can update your keyword list at any time. Be aware that changing the keyword itself or the keyword match type is the same as deleting the original keyword and creating a new one, so after editing the keyword, its statistics will be reset to zero. The same is true when you move a keyword to another ad group. You can make bulk edits or inline edits.
Analytics & Conversion Tracking:
1. How can I link my Analytics account with AdWords account?
First, make sure that you're using the same Google Account email address for both your Analytics and AdWords accounts, and that the AdWords login email address has Admin access for the Analytics account. Then follow these steps to link your Analytics and AdWords accounts. You're finished! Your two accounts should now be linked. If you opted to keep auto-tagging turned on, Analytics will start automatically tagging your AdWords links.
2. How can I unlink my AdWords with Analytics account?
If you are an Administrator of the Analytics account to be unlinked, you can do so from within the 'Edit Account Settings' page. Select ‘Google Analytics’ from the 'Reporting' tab of your AdWords account. Navigate to your ‘Edit Account Settings’ page where you can click on 'Unlink AdWords account from Analytics' to finish. If you do not have Administrator access on the account, please contact the account administrator of the account in order to get the account unlinked.
3. How do I log into my Analytics account?
Try logging in from the Google Analytics home page at www.google.com/analytics with your corresponding login email address for your account. If you've forgotten your password, you can retrieve it from the Password Assistance page at https://www.google.com/accounts/ForgotPasswd.
4. How can I recover a deleted profile in my Analytics account?
It is not possible to recover historical data once a profile has been deleted. Creating a new profile based on a previously existing domain will not re-create the original profile with the historical data.
5. How can I add users to reports in my Analytics account?
You can add any number of users to your Google Analytics account as well as grant varying levels of access to each user. To add a new user or administrator, sign in to your Analytics account. Click 'User Manager.' From the Existing Access table, click 'Add User.' Enter the user's email address, last name, and first name. Select the Access type for this user. If you selected 'View reports only,' select the profiles to which this user should have access and click 'Add.' Click 'Finish.'
To modify access for an existing user, sign in to your Analytics account. Click 'User Manager.' Find the user in the Existing Access list and click 'Edit.' From the Available Website Profiles, select the profiles to which this user should have access and click 'Add.' Click 'Save Changes.
1.Why have I been billed after I canceled my account or paused/deleted my campaigns?
Check for the date when your campaign(s) was paused/deleted or when account was canceled - be assured that you would not have accrued additional costs after the date when any of the above happened. If your account currently has no outstanding balance, it will cause no further charges. It is important that you know more about the billing cycle, as well as how to verify that you had unpaid costs in your account when you were charged.
2. I can't seem to apply a promotional code to redeem it though I have updated my billing information.
Only new accounts are eligible for promotional credit. You can apply a promotional code to your account within 14 days of account creation. If you created your account more than 14 days ago, the promotional code you received will no longer work. In cases where you have not redeemed the credit within the time frame, Google will not be able to offer you another credit.
3. Can you explain the Billing Report?
Your Billing Summary page provides a snapshot view of all your account billing activity. From this page, you can get detailed information about payments, advertising costs, and adjustments over a specified date range. You can go through the detailed explanation of how to navigate your 'Billing Summary' page from the references listed below.
4. How can I redeem my promotional code?
To use an AdWords promotional credit, you have to first enter your billing information. If you haven't yet, then first enter your billing details to enter your promotional code. If you've already entered your billing information, then enter your promotional code. Your promotional credit will appear as a line item labeled 'Service adjustment' for the current month on your 'Billing Summary' page.
5. What are my payment options?
Payment options available depend on your location and currency, which you can find on our Payment Options page. You may have the option to pay for your advertising after accruing costs which is called 'Postpay' or before your ads accrue costs which is called 'Prepay'.
1. What is quality score? How is it calculated?
Quality Score is a dynamic variable calculated for each of your keywords. It combines a variety of factors and measures how relevant your keyword is to your ad text and to a user's search query. A keyword's Quality Score updates frequently and is closely related to its performance.
2. I am getting clicks but only a few people are converting. What should I do?
If you find that a large percentage of visitors click on your ad but don't make purchases, it means that you need to improve the return on investment(ROI) which will increase your conversion rate.
3. My landing page says poor quality but I have made some changes to my website. How frequently is the landing page quality evaluated?
The AdWords system evaluates landing pages on a regular basis. There is no guaranteed timeline of any improvement to your Quality Scores should you make any changes to your landing pages. AdWords retrieves and evaluates advertiser landing pages on a regular basis, but it may take weeks or months for the system to re-evaluate your pages.
4. How does the ranking of ads appear in the Google search results?
A maximum of 8 unique AdWords text ads appear on the right-hand side of a Google search results page. In some cases, ads may also appear in one or more of the three positions above the Google search results. Your ad's position on Google and the search network varies per keyword and is determined by your matched keyword's cost-per-click bid and Quality Score on Google in relation to other advertisers' CPC bids and Quality Scores.
5. What do I do if my ads have a low ad rank?
If your ad has consistently experienced a decrease in ranking, this is likely due to our ad system's focus on promoting more relevant, targeted ads. It is recommended that you optimize your account so that you can take advantage of our keyword evaluation improvements and increase your Quality Score.
1. How do I make money through AdWords?
The AdWords program allows advertisers to reach users on Google and our growing network of search and content sites and products in the Google Network. You may be interested in the Google AdSense program for web publishers. Google AdSense delivers text-based Google AdWords ads that are relevant to what appears on your website. When relevant ads appear on content pages, people click on them. Google will pay you for clicks on ads, so more clicks means more money for you.
Please visit https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35872 to know more about earning using AdSense.
2. I am an affiliate advertiser. Does Google have any policies around that?
We currently don't accept ads for data entry affiliate programs. If you're another type of affiliate, your AdWords account is completely distinct from your affiliate program. Please familiarize yourself with Google's advertising policies which affects many affiliates.
3. I suspect my account has been hijacked.
If you suspect that your adwords account has been hijacked, delete the compromised campaign and recreate your original ads in a new campaign. Be careful not to reactivate the compromised campaign, ad groups and/or ads. Remove any unwanted software in all of your computers and change your Google Account password. Be sure to clean your system first, and then change your password, as malware could capture your password if it's still present within your computer.
Do contact support via:
http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/request.py?contact_type=hacked
4. What is the difference between search and content network where ads are shown?
On the search network your ads will appear alongside or above the results on our partners' search result pages, as well as on other relevant search pages. Search sites are those which provide AdWords ads along with search results after a user searches for a particular keyword.
The Google Content Network is a collection of websites and other products, such as email programs and blogs, who have partnered with Google to display AdWords ads that are targeted based on content themes rather than specific keywords. Content sites display AdWords ads alongside related content; Google scans the content of a Web page every time it is viewed, and automatically selects ads to display when they have keywords matching the page content.
5. No clicks attributed to any keywords, but i see some clicks reported at the end of the table and am being charged.
The reason you are not able to see any clicks attributed to any of your keywords is because individual keywords don't trigger your ads on content pages. Keywords from your entire keyword list, along with several other factors, determine which content pages show your ads. Your campaign is automatically opted into the search and content network, unless you specifically opt out of any of the networks.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
A WebmasterWorld thread reports that Google has cut a few the personalized AdWords representatives from big spend advertisers. The recent report comes from a long time WebmasterWorld member, cline. Cline said he lost his representative because he stopped taking on new clients and Google said they will only provide him a rep if he brings in new clients.
However, others have reported they lost their reps, and soon after, they were banned from AdWords. Some suspect that it is only a matter of time until Cline gets banned, because they feel it is a sign that he will. People in the thread said they know other advertisers who spend over $100,000 per month, lost their Google representative and a month later were banned.
I am not sure if Cline is in the same boat here. Let me quote him:
My agency has had a dedicated Adwords support team since about 2004. I just got notified that we're losing dedicated support. The reason is that even though we're managing ever-increasing spend levels from our existing clients, we're too busy with our existing clients to accept new clients. Adwords only wants to give dedicated support to agencies bringing in new clients and who need help with strategy. We only have technical issues.
In any event, the AdWords bans continue. You can read all about that over here.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
This is a hoax, this is not true, but it spread around the internet over the weekend and I found it pretty funny. Again, this is a comic, who did a skit of some sort. Microsoft confirmed this is not a real employee or ex-employee at Microsoft.
The video portrays a disgruntled ex-Microsoft employee describing how he was fired by Microsoft's CEO, Steve Ballmer, over not saying "Bing" with enthusiasm.
If you know the jokes about Ballmer, this is pretty funny.
Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.
There are dozens of complaints from Christian Google users with their dissatisfaction over the wording of the Google Holiday logo. In short, the complaint is that Google is saying "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas." Christians are asking why Google is saying "Happy Holidays" when no other holiday overlaps with Christmas this year. Chanukah was earlier this month and the other holidays don't seem to fall out during Christmas, so why not say it as it is?
Here are pictures that illustrate the 'politically correct' holiday message from Google:
You can see the logos at google.com/logos/holidays-2009.html.
Here is one of the many complaints in the forum:
For the entirety of Google's history (including this year) they put up a variety of Christmas-themed logos between approximately December 22 and December 25, but they say "happy holidays" and not "Merry Christmas"!!
What other holiday occurs between Dec. 22 and 25?? Why must Google be so politically correct? "Merry Christmas" is one of the most popular greetings in the world! This is ridiculous, why is Google forcing me out of the Christmas spirit?
Forum discussion at several Google Web Search Help threads.
I am seeing random reports, now a total of three individual reports, in the Google Web Search Help forums where users are reporting that Google Images search results are going off the page.
One user posted a picture, which describes the issue. Here is a picture:
It seems like the first row of images is shown on the far left side of the browser and then the rest are displayed down the row, but under the fold. One person explained:
All the images are on the left side of the page going down the page. You can bearly see the image and it is very anouying!! How do u make it so it is back to the normal way, were the images go across the page instear of going down????
Googler, Jem thinks this is some type of browser bug. Jem asked the users to clear their cookies and try again. Jem is also asking users for more feedback so they can debug the issue.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
We thought Google was notgoing to give out holiday gifts, and in exchange, inviting publishers to lunch. But starting yesterday, Google began sending out a holiday e-mail card to both advertisers and publishers. The card basically said Google is doing something a bit different this year and instead of giving out presents, they are giving $20 million to charity on our behalf.
Here is a picture of the e-card which leads to google.com/advertising/holiday2009:
Here is a picture of the landing page:
Overall, people are happy with this as their gift this year. We have thread at DigitalPoint Forums & WebmasterWorld.
Want to see the previous years gifts? See 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums & WebmasterWorld.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
An early WebmasterWorld thread is discussing the topic of Google One Box "blindness." Google One Boxes are those enhanced results you see at the top or within the search results of Google. When they first came out, there were hard to miss, but now SEOs and maybe some searchers are subconsciously blocking them out, like they would ads?
Here are some examples of "one boxes":
Get the point?
Do you think all this injection of special "universal search" results, as well as Google owned content (i.e. YouTube, weather, google groups, blogspot, definitions, etc) is going to eventually suffer from "one box blindness"?
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Google Maps has tons of features, but some of those features are not available in all regions due to many reasons. In order to help document what is and what is not available in certain regions, Google created a page named the Mapping Tool Availability to help you see which Google tools are available for mapping your area.
Google breaks the page down by several regions including Africa, Asia, Caribbean, Central America, Europe, Middle East, North America, Oceania and South America. When you open a region, Google shows you a matrix of what features are available in that area, features such as the Local Business Center, Community Edits, My Maps, Map Maker or Building Maker. Here is a screen capture of the North America matrix:
This will come in handy for the folks in the Google Maps forum and for local business consultants.
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.
A WebmasterWorld thread has new discussion around the topic of pay-per-click (PPC) bidding wars. A PPC bidding war is when two or more advertisers want to out bid each other in the search ads in order to either deplete the funds of the competition or to secure a certain position in the search results.
With the PPC ranking models these days, it is often hard to just compete on price for the top search ad - although it is possible. But bidding wars are somewhat more frequent amongst new advertisers and large brands with large budgets.
The question I have for you is, do you do this? Do you ever compete in PPC bid wars? I doubt I got all the possible options below, but try to not use the "other" option if possible.
Do You Compete in PPC Bidding Wars?(trends)
Tell your friends and colleagues to take this quick poll.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A WebmasterWorld thread reports that when you try to login to Google AdSense using your Android device or an iPhone it rendered the reports all weird. I tried to reproduce this on my side, but I am currently not able to.
What many are reporting is that the report seems to load in an iframe below the login box, after you login. Let me quote one of the reports:
I typed my username and password.
The report appeared just at the place where I typed in username and password.
It seems like the report is in a not scrollable IFRAME starting at the position of the input for username and password
I think I am not having the issue because I am logging in automatically. Google AdSenseAdvisor replied to the thread saying:
I'm investigating. I'll let you know when I hear something back. Thanks for flagging this.
We have no ETA for a fix or even a solid confirmation what type of bug this is.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A local mover reported in a Google Maps Help thread that his competitor has successfully removed his listing from Google Maps by having hundreds of people report his address as "inaccurate" in the Google search results.
Back in October, Google added a link to the map results found in the results to enable users to mark a business listing as accurate or not and this person is claiming that his competitor was able to use that to remove his listing in Google Maps. He said:
He has now used those same fake user accounts to report my addresses as invalid - probably hundreds of times with the number of ID's that he has. The likely automated trigger at Google goes off and the map spammer with the 40 fake address and hundreds, if not thousands, of fake reviews from from bogus accounts wins the day. It's easy to report a bogus address.
Now, I am not sure if this is indeed possible. You can always try to reproduce it, but that might be a bad thing to try to reproduce.
A Google Maps representative, Maps Guide Linda, did reply to this thread saying:
Thanks for reporting this instance of spam to us. We will effectively deal with this user since they are violating our Business Listing Quality Guidelines. Please take a look at our guidelines yourself to make sure your listings comply.
I am not sure if she is referencing the abuse of the "inaccurate" reporting feature or the abuse of this mover posting dozens of duplicate companies in Google Maps.
So can you use the "is this accurate" link to remove competitors from Google?
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.
The next two weeks are typically the slowest two weeks in the search industry (and probably most other industries). It is the holiday week, with Christmas and New Years coming, as well as it being the first day of Winter today.
Google already started their holiday logo blast, although Google missed Chanukah this year, they are calling the logos "Holiday logos". You will be able to see a new one every day and Google will archive them at google.com/logos/holidays-2009.html. Here is the first one:
Like I said, Google will have a new logo each day (maybe I will update this post here or make a new one for those).
Google # 2:
Yahoo is running a flash based logo also for the past few days:
But today is actually the first day of Winter here on our side of the world. And for the day, we have a nice theme from Bing, YouTube and from ourselves as well:
Search Engine Roundtable Winter:
Happy holidays, cold winter and relaxing/healthy next two weeks.
Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums and Google Web Search Help.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
This week in search, I announce that I am hosting SMX SphinnCon Israel on March 7, 2010 in Jerusalem. Google announced the support for cross domain canonical tags. There may have been a Toolbar PageRank penalty earlier this week. Google may add PDF support to fetch as Googlebot. Google dropped Answers.com for their own definitions. Google is testing infinite scroll in image search. Bing might add "page score" to their toolbar. MSNBot crawls pages twice, once for compressed http and one for uncompressed. Google's new QR codes on the favorite places maps decals are sending users to wrong business, likely because of QR scanners and not Google. Google messed up the AdSense reporting again. Yahoo Search Marketing ads went down for a short period of time. Google is now in the URL shortening business with goo.gl. Google may buy Yelp for $500 million. Google is inviting publishers for Christmas lunch. Google's Im Feeling Lucky button does the New Year countdown. Google did a Doodle for Zamenhof. Google forgot about The Simpons 20th birthday, a shame. That was this past week at the Search Engine Roundtable.
Make sure to subscribe to our video feed or subscribe directly on iTunes to be notified of these updates and download the video in the background. Here is the YouTube version of the feed:
For the original iTunes version, click here or to see the YouTube version in higher quality, click play & hit "HD."
Search Topics of Discussion:
Misc:
Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!
I wanted to wish The Simpsons a very happy 20th birthday. I have been personally watching the show for 20 years, crazy to believe. I am surprised to see none of the search engines doing a logo for the special day.
That won't stop us from posting a special theme. Here it is:
I know this has no search relevancy at all - so I apologize.
Happy 20th Birthday!
Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.
Earlier this month, Google dropped Answers.com as their definitions provider. A month ago or so, Google would link from the word "definition" to Answers.com, now Google links to themselves.
For example, a search for [definitions] shows a hyperlink named "definition". Here is a picture:
When you click on it, it now takes you to Google Definitions at Google.com/Dictionary. In the past, and since early 2005 it took you to Answers.com.
I have not seen a thread or complain about this until today - so I guess most people didn't take much notice. The thread is at Google Web Search Help and it reads:
The "definition" feature Google has in its search page includes lots of features including comprehensive dictionary, pronunciation of words, translation to many other languages, all this gone, I have noticed its format was changed recently to a very simple uninformative format, very very disappointing! I was using it quite a lot.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
There are a few reports in a Bing Forum thread that adding a site to Bing Webmaster Tools might not work. Specifically, if the URL or domain contains a hyphen (dash) such as www.best-domain.com.
Brett Yount from the Bing Webmaster team confirmed the bug, saying:
Currently, we are having a few difficulties which I just received confirmation from the indexing team. They are currently working on it, but said that if you try a couple times, it should work. If not, and your site isn't in the index at all , please post on the not in index thread and I will work to get your home page (only) into the index.
I personally tried adding a domain with a hyphen and it worked for me on the first try. So maybe it is resolved or maybe those specific domains have other issues?
Forum discussion at Bing Forum.
On Friday afternoon, I reported My Google Favorite Place Decal Was Hijacked. In short, it turned out the QR code was indeed correct, but if the QR code scanner reads it wrong, it can take you to a different business. Which is what happens when I use certain scanners or if the lighting is poor when I scan using certain apps.
Here is a quick video of how this went down on Friday afternoon:
Now, I am not the only one experiencing these problems. I have spotted at least four threads (I know there are more) with complaints about their QR codes not working.
Let me pull out the various complaints from the four Google Maps Help threads I found:
The card I received in the mail from Google indicating we are a "Favorite Place" takes the user to the wrong business. Hundreds of miles away.
My card takes users to the generic google mobile home page?!?!?!
Same issue, mine goes to the generic google home page.
I got someone with an iPhone to test it out and it goes to info on some store in New York City, not my store, Epic Biking (www.epicbiking.com), in Saratoga Springs UTAH.
Once our Favorite Place decal is scanned it directs to the Double Tree Marriot in Palm Beach Gardens, FL as opposed to our listing Land Rover Palm Beach.
We're having the same exact issue. Except, ours is Starwood Hotels in New York when it should link to OK4WD. I scanned the thing probably a good five or six times too
When I had my issue, Ryan Hayward from Google contacted me immediately. I learned from him that in my case, it was not a data issue on Google's side, but rather an issue with the scanner reading the code incorrectly or missing pieces of the code. From what I understand, the code itself stores data in it, such as addresses, URLs, names and so on. So technically, I do not think Google printed these codes with a specific unique identifier in them for your business to match up in the Google Local Business Center. I think Google printed these codes to have address information and that is all. I can be wrong, but I think this is how it is working.
The overall issue here is that the codes are not working for many many businesses and searchers. It doesn't matter if it is a Google bug or a scanner bug, it is not working for a lot of people and lot of the time.
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help threads.
Brett Yount from the Bing Webmaster Team dropped a hint in the Bing Forums that they may add the Bing Page Score (similar to Google's PageRank) to the MSN Toolbar.
Bing has what they call Bing Page Score when you login to their Bing Webmaster Center. Someone asked in the thread, "is it possible to enable page rank in bing toolbar?"
Soon after, Brett Yount from Bing responded saying:
We might once we complete the rework of that tool, which will be Fall earliest. Good news is, there are some changes in the works due in May/June to many things important to the webmasters frequenting these forums.
So there are two things here:
(1) Bing's Page Score may come to their Toolbar.
(2) They will be reworking "that tool," which I believe is talking about Page Score specifically.
Forum discussion at Bing Forums.
It appears that Google is not giving out holiday gifts this year, as expected. But in a surprise twist, AdSenseAdvisor in a WebmasterWorld thread basically invited all 'good standing' AdSense publishers out for lunch at Google.
First, AdSenseAdvisor explained that she/he doesn't "know about gifts this year," and added that she/he "haven't heard anything" about it. AdSenseAdvisor then goes on to invite AdSense publishers out for Christmas lunch!
AdSenseAdvisor said:
If you're a publisher in good standing with AdSense and you're ever in the Bay Area, shoot me a private message and I'd be happy to invite you to lunch at Google.
So, if you are upset you didn't get a holiday gift from Google and want to go out for lunch with AdSenseAdvisor, you know what to do. Go to the WebmasterWorld and send AdSenseAdvisor a private message.
In related news, WebmasterWorld moderator, martinibuster, said he sent Google a thank you Christmas card. He explained in a WebmasterWorld thread:
I sent the AdSense Team a Christmas Card to thank them for hanging out in this forum, for listening to our feedback, for acting on our feedback. 2009 is the year that the AdSense Team kicked butt on a number of fronts, including rolling out new ways for us to block unwanted ads, decreasing the time for ads to stop showing once we add them to our filters, for being responsive during the several glitches we have experienced and correcting them swiftly.
So if you want to mail holiday cheer to Google, you can send it to:
AdSense Advisor
c/o The AdSense Team
1600 Amphitheater Pkwy
Mountain View, CA 94043
How nice!
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
The canonical tag was jointly introduced by Google, Yahoo and Microsoft earlier this year. Google hinted they would soon support cross domain canonical tag and they officially announced it last night. What is a canonical tag? It basically allows you to communicate to Google that a page has moved to a new location, without you using a server side 301 redirect.
Why is this important? A few reasons:
(1) Some hosts don't allow webmasters to deploy 301 redirects
(2) Some site owners aren't technical enough to implement a 301 redirect
(3) In some cases, webmasters do not want to redirect users but rather only search engines (i.e. pagination, weird filtering, tracking parameters added to URLs, etc).
Initially this was launched to work within a domain only. So you could only say that domainA.com/pageA has moved to domainA.com/pageB. Now you are able to do this across domains, so you can say, domainA.com/pageA has moved to domainB.com/pageA or even domainA.com moved to domainB.com.
Google made this cute graphic to explain it:
There is a lot of technical detail on how to implement this tag over here but in short, you just add this tag to the head section of your HTML of the page you want to redirect. Make sure the URL you specify is the URL you want GoogleBot to be redirected to:
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/true-url.html" />
JohnMu, who wrote the Google blog post also put some FAQs, and note the "hint" he keeps referring to. I assume the "hint" will become less of a hint and more of an "instruction" as time goes on.
Q: Do the pages have to be identical? A: No, but they should be similar. Slight differences are fine.
Q: For technical reasons I can't include a 1:1 mapping for the URLs on my sites. Can I just point the rel="canonical" at the homepage of my preferred site?
A: No; this could result in problems. A mapping from old URL to new URL for each URL on the old site is the best way to use rel="canonical".Q: I'm offering my content / product descriptions for syndication. Do my publishers need to use rel="canonical"?
A: We leave this up to you and your publishers. If the content is similar enough, it might make sense to use rel="canonical", if both parties agree.Q: My server can't do a 301 (permanent) redirect. Can I use rel="canonical" to move my site?
A: If it's at all possible, you should work with your webhost or web server to do a 301 redirect. Keep in mind that we treat rel="canonical" as a hint, and other search engines may handle it differently. But if a 301 redirect is impossible for some reason, then a rel="canonical" may work for you. For more information, see our guidelines on moving your site.Q: Should I use a noindex robots meta tag on pages with a rel="canonical" link element?
A: No, since those pages would not be equivalent with regards to indexing - one would be allowed while the other would be blocked. Additionally, it's important that these pages are not disallowed from crawling through a robots.txt file, otherwise search engine crawlers will not be able to discover the rel="canonical" link element.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.
Here is one more oddity to add to Microsoft Bing's web crawler, MSNBot. Why on earth are people reporting that MSNBot is crawling the same page twice, once for the compressed version and then once again for the uncompressed version? Technically, it should probably only crawl once and it should opt for the compressed, gzip version - don't you think?
We have two threads complaining about this, one oldish one at WebmasterWorld and another at Bing Forums. Let me quote the Bing thread:
I've notice that bing is crawling each page of my website twice, first making an HTTP 1.1 request and getting a compressed response then immediately issuing an HTTP 1.0 request to receive the same page without gzip compression
The following lines from my log show the issue (there are thousands more similar occurrences):
65.55.207.74 - - [13/Dec/2009:14:58:42 +0000] "GET /specimen/235698/ HTTP/1.1" 200 1742 "-" "msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)"
65.55.207.74 - - [13/Dec/2009:14:59:06 +0000] "GET /specimen/235698/ HTTP/1.0" 200 4259 "-" "msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)"
65.55.106.209 - - [13/Dec/2009:15:03:08 +0000] "GET /specimen/250262/ HTTP/1.1" 200 1733 "-" "msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)"
65.55.106.209 - - [13/Dec/2009:15:03:14 +0000] "GET /specimen/250262/ HTTP/1.0" 200 4164 "-" "msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)"
This seems a waste of bandwidth and completely defeats the point of supporting http compression.
Indeed a waste of bandwidth and yes, it defeats the point of supporting HTTP compression.
A Bing representative, Brett Yount said:
could you please mail this information to bwmc@microsoft.com and I will get our crawling team to check it out?
But we have no confirmation from Bing on why this issue is occurring or when it will be fixed. Like I said, just one more oddity to add to MSNBot's crawl behavior.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and Bing Forums.
Over a month ago, there were reports in two Google Maps Help threads that the local pack for searches in the flavor of [web design], [web development] and so on, were not triggering local pack results. We covered this about three weeks ago with our story named Google Bug Removes Web Designers in Local Pack and it is still not fixed.
Back then, a Googler said the reason for the bug had to do with a one box local result bug being fixed to show a local 7 pack. That bug was fixed, but it triggered a new bug with queries such as [web design], [web development] and so on. Even if you add a local qualifier to such queries, i.e. [web design new york] or [web design 10010] the local pack is not triggered at all.
Google never offered an ETA for when this would be fixed, but it has been a month since a Googler responded to the issue and we have yet to get an update, while the bug lingers on. Google, when will this bug be resolved?
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.
A WebmasterWorld thread reports that Yahoo Search Marketing is down for some. When some advertisers are trying to use Yahoo's pay per click ad system, they get an error.
The error reads:
We are currently experiencing a technical issue that is causing the ads of some advertisers to not be displayed properly to users. This may cause your account to receive a lower volume of clicks than normal. We are aware of this issue, and are working diligently to resolve it as soon as possible. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.
So far, we have two confirmed reports of this bug in the WebmasterWorld thread.
I am not sure how widespread the issue is or if it is resolved yet.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Yahoo updated the thread, saying:
I can confirm that this issue was resolved at approximately 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time on December 15, and ads should be displaying normally since then. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Search Marketing Expo's SphinnCon is coming back to Jerusalem, Israel on March 7, 2010. The premier networking event is being hosted by Barry Schwartz, Search Engine Land's News Editor at the Jerusalem College of Technology, a premier sponsor the event. To learn more about the event, visit searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon.
Make sure to register quickly over at searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon before it is sold out. The last time we held this event, it was sold out several weeks in advance. You won't want to miss out on jammed packed half day of sessions on SEO, PPC, Web Analytics, Social Media and much more. With both global and local experts in search marketing, including representatives from Google, Search Engine Land and other well-known companies - there is nothing like this event anywhere.
SphinnCon is an intimate and 1-day event. Conference tickets are priced at only $50 per attendee, but it is limited to only 200 attendees. So make sure to register quickly, before all the seats are taken.
The low price is only made possible from our gracious sponsors, including the Jerusalem College of Technology. I must thank the Jerusalem College of Technology for providing the venue, video equipment, and so much more. "The Jerusalem College of Technology is proud to once again host this important event. I believe that the institution is a natural home for this type of activity as it has long been at the forefront of both the high-tech world and technological management," said Dr. Avi Kay, Chair of the Department of Technological Management and Marketing.
Our current speaker list includes both global and local experts, such as Barry Schwartz, President of RustyBrick, a Google representative from Google Israel and the webmaster team, Vanessa Fox, Author of Marketing in the Age of Google, Ophir Cohen, CEO, Compucall Web Marketing, Branko Rihtman, SEO & R&D Specialist at WhiteWeb, Gilad Sasson, Director of Search & Online Marketing at Nekuda, Eli Feldblum, Founder & CTO at RankAbove and many others.
Our current sponsors include the Jerusalem College of Technology, Compucall Web Marketing and Answers.com. If you are interested in sponsoring please visit searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon for more information.
Want to speak? Again visit searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon.
I urge you to register as soon as possible before all the seats are taken. Register at searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon by clicking on the "Ready to Register? CLICK HERE" icon at the top right. You will be taken to the MeetUp website and asked to register and pay over there.
Don't miss out, register today at searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon.
Event Quick Details:
Date: Sunday, March 7, 2009
Time: 11:30am to 6pm
Venue: Jerusalem College of Technology
Location: 21 HaVaad Haleumi St, Givat Mordechai, Jerusalem
Cost: $50
Max Attendance: 200 people
If you visit Google today, you will see a special logo that celebrates L. L. Zamenhof's 150th birthday. Zamenhof was born on December 15, 1859 and died on April 14, 1917. He is known as the inventor of Esperanto, a constructed language designed for international communication.
Here is Google's special Doodle for his birthday:
Google has a special page just searching for this language at google.com/intl/eo.
Zamenhof was Jewish and died in Warsaw, Poland. You can read his full bio at Wikipedia.
With almost all Google Doodles, there are always complaints. We have two Google Web Search Help threads. One is thanking Google for commemorating L. L. Zamenhof life, while the other is upset Google picked L. L. Zamenhof over the ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights, which happened on December 15, 1791 (218 years ago).
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
The big Google shock from last night was that they are launching a URL shortener using goo.gl. Currently, it only works by using the Google Toolbar or within FeedBurner. You cannot simply create a short URL by going to goo.gl, you need to do so via the Google Toolbar or FeedBurner.
Why is Google doing this? They want to make it easier to share within the Toolbar and FeedBurner. Why not use Bit.ly or Tiny URL? Google said they have an infrastructure that they trust is stable, secure and speedy.
I see why SEOs are a bit skeptical. But flip it around. SEOs have been recommending that we build our own URL shorteners ourselves. Heck, I did for RustyBrick, for example we use rb.tc, so rb.tc/barry goes to www.rustybrick.com/barry.
Google hasn't yet opened it up for use outside of the Toolbar or FeedBurner, but trust me, it will be used plenty that way and shared tremendously. Google said, "if the service proves useful, we may eventually make it available for a wider audience in the future." So, how long do you give it? A month, two?
Many just feel bad for the url shortening services out there.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld & DigitalPoint Forums.
Developers who code for the AdWords API do not want to miss the upcoming AdWords API v2009 Hack Days. There is one in San Francisco on January 7, 2010 and on in New York on January 14, 2010. The event is free and runs most the day, plus you get a free Google lunch. Keep in mind, the event is only for developers.
Eric Koleda from the Google AdWords API Team extended the invite in the AdWords API Forum. Eric said:
Have you been putting off migrating to v2009? Not sure where to start? Been way too busy? Well it's time to jump start your v2009 development with some in-person help from Google. Join us in Mountain View or New York for a full day of non-stop v2009 hacking.
To keep things interesting throughout the day, we'll do some coding demos of the cool things you can do with v2009 that weren't possible in v13, like asynchronous calls, dynamic ad parameters, and more. Non-engineers beware! This is a developer-only event, and there will be no content or activities for attendees who don't plan to write code.
Space is limited, and signups are on a first come, first serve basis. We ask that you limit attendees to two people per company. If you are based in Europe please don't register yet, as a similar EMEA event is in the works and will be announced shortly.
More information and the signup form are available here: [sites.google.com]
Event Details include:
Dates: San Francisco - January 7th or New York - January 14th
Time: 10am until 5pm
Locations: 345 Spear St, San Francisco, CA 94105 or 75 9th Ave, New York, NY 10011
Topics: Migrating a sample application to v2009, Using AdParameters to bring your text ads to life, Asynchronous Jobs: massive changes made fast and easy, Effective local advertising with Local Ad Extensions, And more!
Sign up over here.
Forum discussion at AdWords API Forum.
If you are living under a rock, you might not have heard this yet, but then why would you be reading this site? The buzz over the weekend was that Google confirmed they will be building and distributing a real Google phone. Right now, Google has Android which is the Operating System for many of the "Google phones" currently out there. But the hardware is developed by someone else.
It appears that Google is designing their own device on the hardware level. Which, I guess, would compete directly with the iPhone - which is what is currently happening with the HTC, Droid and comparable devices.
Anyway, that is all I have to say about this. You can read the news stories on Techmeme and then join the forum discussions.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
If you go to Google.com and click on the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button, Google will show you a countdown to the new year. You cannot type anything into the search box for this to work, just click on the button with an empty search box.
Here is a video of it working just minutes ago, on my screen:
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help and DigitalPoint Forums.
Starting over the weekend, if you tried to update a Google Maps business listing in the Google Local Business Center, you would get a weird error. We have many reports in the Google Maps forums, many.
The error sometimes looks like this:
System ErrorWe're sorry, but we are unable to serve your request at this time. Please try back in a few minutes.
Try again document.write("|nx3ca hrefx3dx22/local/add/businessCenter?hlx3den-USx26amp;glx3dUSx22 onclickx3dx22history.go(-1); return false;x22x3e
Return to previous pagex3c/ax3e"); | Return to previous page
Google Maps Guide Linda replied to many of the threads with the same message, it read:
Hi,
We're aware of this system error issue and we hope to have this fixed by next week. Please check your account again next week to verify your business listing.
Thanks for your patience.
Best,
Maps Guide Linda
The Google Maps threads include these four help threads, but I believe there are many more.
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help Discussions.
Liz from YouTube Support announced in a YouTube Help thread that a long requested feature is now available - the ability to block subscribers from your channel.
Why would you want to block specific subscribers? Maybe you got 'pervs' watching your videos? Maybe you don't like certain commentators on your videos? Maybe you are anti-social?
How do you do it?
1. Sign into your YouTube account
2. Go to http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=[YOURUSERNAME]&view=subscribers
3. On this page you'll be able to see the users who are subscribed to your channel and the thumbnail icon from their channel. Below the thumbnail image you'll see a "Block" button.
4. If you click the "Block" button you'll remove the user's subscription to you, and you'll also block them if their account is active on YouTube.
After that, Liz explains:
You'll receive a confirmation asking you whether or not you want to remove the user from your subscribers list first before you actually remove the user. This is just in case you accidentally click the "Block" button. We all know accidents happen.
Here is a picture of the block button:
I won't block you, so feel free to subscribe to the RustyBrick YouTube Channel which is what I use to do my weekly search videos, amongst other videos. I still need to make that page look better, one day - one day.
Forum discussion at YouTube Help.
Just a reminder, we did not do a video recap last week, we did a text one - so if you missed it, check it out. This week was the SES Chicago conference and we covered tons of sessions. Google switched personalized search on by default and SEOs are freaking out. Google and Yahoo both added real time Twitter results to the search results. Google launched image based search with Google Goggles. Google will add a trustworthy indicator to the page speed report because webmeisters aren't sure if it is accurate. Why? Well, both Google AdSense and Analytics have long page load times, but AdSense will be fixed and Google told us to ignore Analytics. Bing will crawl a 301 two or three times before registering it. We also posted our December Google webmaster report. Google is taking Google Money scammer to court and AdSense Pirates are becoming more of a problem. Ruscoe from Google Blogocoped is joining Google next month. Being an AdSense publisher doesn't mean Google will be a job reference for you. Don't search for 123456 in Google, you might get slapped in the face. Yahoo closed their deal with Microsoft, now they wait on the regulators (sorry, did not cover in video). Google had a Popeye logo this week. Tonight is Chanukah and Bing and we have themes live. Happy Chanukah everyone and have a great weekend. That was this past week at the Search Engine Roundtable.
Make sure to subscribe to our video feed or subscribe directly on iTunes to be notified of these updates and download the video in the background. Here is the YouTube version of the feed:
For the original iTunes version, click here or to see the YouTube version in higher quality, click play & hit "HD."
Search Topics of Discussion:
Conference:
Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Update: Google reached out to me and asked me to try a new app to scan it, such as Barcode Scanner for Android of QuickMark for iPhone. I tried it and both QuickMark and Barcode Scanner return my business. So a poor quality QR scanner will return a bad listing. I guess technically, this is not a Google bug.
We are aware of Google Maps listings being hijacked, that is nothing new. But remember Google is sending out favorite places decals? Well, I got mine today and I decided to try it out.
Guess what? When you scan the QR bar code it takes you to a different business!
RustyBrick is my company and here is my Google Place:
Here is a video with proof:
Here is a link to the Citrus Grille which is what comes up after you scan my code.
Here is a video of me "unboxing" the decal today:
I am not sure how Google can fix this? Either:
(1) Send me a new decal with new bar code?
(2) Update their database so they do not have to send me a new decal?
The thing is, I just hope I don't get calls from the Citrus Grille, that would be annoying!
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.
Chanukah (Hanukah) starts tonight, technically, in Israel it is already Chanukah. It last for eight days and this year it does not overlap with Christmas. Currently, the only major search engine to have a logo or theme up is Microsoft's Bing. Google (even Google.co.il), Yahoo, and Ask.com do not have a theme up yet. Maybe they will wait for tonight or tomorrow, but for now, here is Bing's theme:
We also have theme, sporting driedels with SEO spelled on them out of our name, the Search Engine rOundtable.
Also, Cre8asite Forums plans on uploading this logo shortly for the holiday season:
We will update this post with more logos if they come out. For the past years, see 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.
Update: Ask.com posted a theme on Saturday, December 12th, see Nick's comment below:
No logo from Google, Yahoo or others.
Not to be outdone by Google, Yahoo also added real-time Twitter results for "buzzing" keyword phrases. I tried to replicate any results on Yahoo, but I was not yet able to see them. Maybe it is still rolling out.
The industry is discussing the Yahoo roll out at WebmasterWorld.
Meanwhile, sometime mid-afternoon yesterday, the real time results Google previewed a couple days ago, went live in the main Google search results. SEOs and Webmasters are now playing with it, looking for ways to exploit take advantage of it. There is discussion on it going live at WebmasterWorld.
Both Rae at OutSpokenMedia.com and Danny at Search Engine Land covered how the results can be exploited and get a be "mad."
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld (Yahoo) and WebmasterWorld (Google).
Google AdWords account phishing attempts is nothing new. We reported them numerous times in the past, and then stopped reporting all the cases. Even Yahoo Search Marketing has their share of this issue.
A new type of AdWords phishing attempt has been reported at WebmasterWorld. This one is targeting My Client Center accounts, which are accounts that have control and access to multiple AdWords accounts. So if someone gains access to a My Client Center account, they can potential damage a multitude of accounts.
The domain they are taking unsuspecting users to is google-ob.com. So please Beware!
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A Google Web Search Help thread reports that he was testing to make sure his boss's computer network had connectivity, so he searched for [123456] in Google and up came a porn video hosted on Google Video in the top result.
Here is a picture:
The video on the right is complete adult pornographic material - so don't click on it (unless you want porn, then click on it).
The person who spotted this was very disturbed. He said:
I was assisting our CEO's secretary today, and to test whether she had connectivity, I did a quick search on google for "123456".
She thought I was being disgusting, but I eventually convinced her it was a freak occurrence.
Can you imagine that, this woman thought this guy was playing a trick on her or something. How sad.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
Yesterday at about 3:30pm (EST) Google changed the AdSense console overview page to show the word "estimated" by "Today's Earnings." So now it reads, "Today's estimated earnings" instead of just "Today's earnings." A WebmasterWorld thread was started to ask questions about this change, and then the Google AdSense Blog confirmed the change.
Here is a picture highlighting the change:
Google explained:
In order to be more transparent about how our system calculates earnings, we've added the words "Estimated" and "Finalized" next to "Earnings" throughout your account. Rest assured these terminology changes don't reflect a change to the way your finalized earnings are calculated. It's simply intended to give you a clearer idea of what's our estimation of your earnings and what's finalized.
Don't like it? Not happy? Got more questions?
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A person seeking new employment asked in a WebmasterWorld thread if he can use Google as a reference for his interviews. Why does he feel he might be able to use Google in this way? Well, he never really worked as a Google employee, but he did get checks from Google via their AdSense program.
AdSenseAdvisor, from Google said:
I love that AdSense has been your primary source of income. Sadly, I don't personally know enough about you or your work to provide you with a reference.
Yes, it doesn't work that way does it? How can Google vouch for someone that they do not directly manage?
Ironically, this is not the first time we covered this topic. We said it clear with Google AdSense Publishers Are Not Employed By Google over two years ago. You simply cannot put down Google on your resume, even if you made money with Google AdSense. That doesn't mean you cannot show interviewers how much you made and what tactics you deployed to make your sites successful.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Since Google has released the Site Performance reports in Webmaster Tools and page speed is Google's 2010 ranking factor promise, Webmasters have been somewhat obsessed with speeding up their sites.
Webmasters are concerned with scripts they do not control. Such as Google Analytics slowing down their page load times. In fact, we just reported that Google is going to add a trustworthy indicator to site performance reports in order to alleviate some of the webmaster stress over speed performance.
Now, we see reports that Google AdSense is slow. But instead of Google just telling us not to worry about it, which they have told us for this. Google is actually going to speed up the AdSense load time specifically for GoogleBot.
AdSenseAdvisor said in a WebmasterWorld thread two things. The first was not to worry about it and the second was that they will be improving the speed of AdSense specifically for GoogleBot.
Let me quote AdSense Advisor:
(1) "The Page Speed suggestions on Webmaster Tools are based on the content served to Googlebot. In this case, AdSense serves the javascript uncompressed to Googlebot, but does actually compress it with gzip for regular users. So, the AdSense javascript is already optimized for your site's users. AdSense works very hard at making sure that it doesn't slow down the page load."
(2) "We are changing AdSense to send compressed content to our Googlebot so that the recommendation in Webmaster Central accurately reflects how AdSense works."
Now some may ask if this is a form of serving different content to GoogleBot versus a human - i.e. cloaking. I don't think this falls under that.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
I spotted a useful tidbit for SEOs in the Bing Forums today. Brett Yount from Bing Webmaster Center team explained how Bing picks up on 301 redirects.
Brett said it can take two to three crawls from Bing to register a 301 redirect in their index. Brett said:
By design, our crawler usually takes 2-3 crawls before it registers the redirect.
I wonder how many crawls Google takes to do the same thing? I can see why you would want to wait at least for a second crawl to confirm a 301 redirect is indeed legit.
We had some reports recently that Bing is handling 301s much better now than they have in the past.
Forum discussion at Bing Forums.
Voting is open for the UK's edition of the Doodle 4 Google competition. Google has run this competition in both the US and UK for four years now.
This years competition:
We're asking young people aged 5–16 from across the UK to design their own doodle. This year's theme is 'My Hero'. We'd love to see the figures young people look up to represented in their doodles, whether family, friends, people in the community, or world figures. We're interested in the people considered heroes for the 21st century and how entrants represent them using images.
To vote, go to this page. You can vote for each of the four brackets, 5-7 years old, 7-11 years old, 11-14 years old and 14-16 years olds.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.
A Google Webmaster Help thread has reports of page load time speeds spiking up to ridiculous numbers in the new Google site performance reports. Google's response to these reports was pretty interesting, I'll get to that soon, firs the context.
A Top Contributor in the forum wrote:
After about 6 months of "flat line" Site Performance reports of averagepage load time around 1 or 2 seconds, I am now seeing in Tools a report that: "On average, pages in your site take 83.1 seconds to load (updated on Dec 7, 2009)." and of course the graph has shot up and I'm tol that my site's average page load time is "slower than 100% of sites".
However, the only two pages listed in that report both show load times of 1 to 2 seconds.
Now a Googler with the code name "sreeram" replied saying:
The 83s number is bogus. Your site's toolbar traffic dropped by more than an order of magnitude in the last few days. You should ignore the average for now. We'll soon be showing site owners some indication of how trustworthy the numbers are, so you can decide when to ignore it and when not to.Not all URLs may have toolbar traffic, so it's possible to have many URLs indexed, and even visited by users, but only a couple may show up on Site Performance. In addition, when there's very little data for a given URL, we won't display it (for privacy reasons), though it will be included in the overall site average.
So in this case, the site's traffic as seen by the Google Toolbar dropped significantly, which caused a weird spike in the webmaster's site performance reports. Thus, Google promised to provide an "indication of how trustworthy the numbers are" in this report.
Clearly, some of these numbers are not trustworthy, such as factoring in Toolbar fluctuations or Google Analytics speed.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.
Update: John Mueller from Google sent me a note about this:
The Webmaster Tools team is constantly working on ways to improve the product as well as the data provided there. In general, we prefer not to comment on possible future releases. The Labs section in Webmaster Tools allows us to easily try out and iterate on new and innovative features, which is one reason we launched the Site Performance tool there. Personally, I found the data provided there quite actionable and have seen a lot of positive feedback from webmasters around this tool. To fine-tune a website with regards to speed, it can be useful to start with the information provided here and then to look into the details using browser-based tools such as Page Speed and Speed Tracer.
We're always looking into ways we can take our products and services to the next level. We appreciate all of the feedback and coverage that you provide! I'll get in touch with you once I have more information that I can share.
A Google Web Search Help thread reports several users not being able to see the frame at the top of the Google Image searches. I initially thought it had to do with frame busters of some sort, but it seems more wide spread than that. Maybe Google is dropping the framed image feature? I am not sure.
I personally see the frame with the "see full size image" option link:
It really seems to be that this is a frame buster type of thing going on. Frame busting is code that prevents other sites from framing you site in their site, like Google Images does after you initially click on an image result.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Below is live coverage of the Cool Mobile Apps, Augmented Reality - It's a Brave New World from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Barry Schwartz of RustyBrick.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
/* Adjust the height to best suite your page */ /* Remove height property to have all text show without scrollbars. */ #cil_page .mainchat { position: relative; overflow: auto; } scrollpos[1]) { divtop = document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } else { divtop = scrollpos[1] - document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').offsetTop + document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.left = divleft + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.top = divtop + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'inline'; } function cil_closeLayer(){ if (document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display != 'none') { document.getElementById('cil_divsrc').innerHTML = ''; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'none'; } } function cil_replaceString(oldS, newS, fullS) { for (var i = 0; i 0) { position = [document.documentElement.scrollLeft,document.documentElement.scrollTop]; } else if (typeof document.body.scrollTop != 'undefined') { position = [document.body.scrollLeft,document.body.scrollTop]; } return position; } function cil_getCurrentStyle(elem, prop) { if( elem.currentStyle ) { var ar = prop.match(/w[^-]*/g); var s = ar[0]; for(var i = 1; i
| Cool Mobile Apps, Augmented Reality - It's a Brave New World | (12/08/2009) |
| Close |
| 4:03 |
|
| 4:03 |
|
| 4:09 |
|
| 4:14 |
|
| 4:16 |
|
| 4:19 |
|
| 4:20 |
|
| 4:21 |
|
| 4:21 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 4:21 |
| 4:21 |
|
| 4:22 |
|
| 4:23 |
|
| 4:24 |
|
| 4:24 |
|
| 4:25 |
|
| 4:25 |
|
| 4:26 |
|
| 4:27 |
|
| 4:27 |
|
| 4:29 |
|
| 4:30 |
|
| 4:30 |
|
| 4:31 |
|
| 4:31 |
|
| 4:32 |
|
| 4:33 |
|
| 4:33 |
|
| 4:34 |
|
| 4:34 |
|
| 4:36 |
|
| 4:36 |
|
| 4:38 |
|
| 4:39 |
|
| 4:41 |
|
| 4:41 |
|
| 4:42 |
|
| 4:42 |
|
| 4:43 |
|
| 4:44 |
|
| 4:44 |
|
| 4:44 |
|
| 4:45 |
|
| 4:47 |
|
| 4:47 |
|
| 4:47 |
|
| 4:47 |
|
| 4:48 |
|
| 4:48 |
|
| 4:48 |
|
| 4:49 |
|
| 4:50 |
|
| 4:50 |
|
| 4:51 |
|
| 4:52 |
|
| 4:52 |
|
| 4:55 |
|
| 4:56 |
|
| 4:58 |
|
| 4:58 |
|
Below is live coverage of the Turning Simple Change into Big Profit from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Brian Ussery - Beu Blog.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
/* Adjust the height to best suite your page */ /* Remove height property to have all text show without scrollbars. */ #cil_page .mainchat { position: relative; overflow: auto; } scrollpos[1]) { divtop = document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } else { divtop = scrollpos[1] - document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').offsetTop + document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.left = divleft + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.top = divtop + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'inline'; } function cil_closeLayer(){ if (document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display != 'none') { document.getElementById('cil_divsrc').innerHTML = ''; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'none'; } } function cil_replaceString(oldS, newS, fullS) { for (var i = 0; i 0) { position = [document.documentElement.scrollLeft,document.documentElement.scrollTop]; } else if (typeof document.body.scrollTop != 'undefined') { position = [document.body.scrollLeft,document.body.scrollTop]; } return position; } function cil_getCurrentStyle(elem, prop) { if( elem.currentStyle ) { var ar = prop.match(/w[^-]*/g); var s = ar[0]; for(var i = 1; i
| Turning Simple Change into Big Profit | (12/08/2009) |
| Close |
| 4:25 |
|
| 4:25 |
|
| 4:30 |
|
| 4:34 |
|
| 4:38 |
|
| 4:40 |
|
| 4:40 |
|
| 4:41 |
|
| 4:45 |
|
| 4:49 |
|
| 4:53 |
|
| 4:56 |
|
| 4:59 |
|
| 5:04 |
|
| 5:06 |
|
| 5:06 |
|
| 5:13 |
|
| 5:13 |
|
Below is live coverage of the How to Speak Geek: Working Collaboratively With Your IT Department to Achieve Business Goals from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Chris Boggs of Rosetta.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
/* Adjust the height to best suite your page */ /* Remove height property to have all text show without scrollbars. */ #cil_page .mainchat { position: relative; overflow: auto; } scrollpos[1]) { divtop = document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } else { divtop = scrollpos[1] - document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').offsetTop + document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.left = divleft + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.top = divtop + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'inline'; } function cil_closeLayer(){ if (document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display != 'none') { document.getElementById('cil_divsrc').innerHTML = ''; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'none'; } } function cil_replaceString(oldS, newS, fullS) { for (var i = 0; i 0) { position = [document.documentElement.scrollLeft,document.documentElement.scrollTop]; } else if (typeof document.body.scrollTop != 'undefined') { position = [document.body.scrollLeft,document.body.scrollTop]; } return position; } function cil_getCurrentStyle(elem, prop) { if( elem.currentStyle ) { var ar = prop.match(/w[^-]*/g); var s = ar[0]; for(var i = 1; i
| How to Speak Geek: Working Collaboratively With Your IT Department to Achieve Business Goa | (12/08/2009) |
| Close |
| 4:19 |
|
| 4:19 |
|
| 4:21 |
|
| 4:21 |
|
| 4:22 |
|
| 4:23 |
|
| 4:24 |
|
| 4:25 |
|
| 4:26 |
|
| 4:27 |
|
| 4:28 |
|
| 4:29 |
|
| 4:34 |
|
| 4:35 |
|
| 4:36 |
|
| 4:37 |
|
| 4:40 |
|
| 4:41 |
|
| 4:43 |
|
| 4:47 |
|
| 4:52 |
|
| 4:52 |
|
| 4:53 |
|
| 4:55 |
|
| 4:57 |
|
| 4:57 |
|
| 4:58 |
|
| 4:59 |
|
| 4:59 |
|
| 5:00 |
|
| 5:01 |
|
| 5:02 |
|
| 5:04 |
|
| 5:05 |
|
| 5:07 |
|
| 5:09 |
|
| 5:10 |
|
| 5:12 |
|
| 5:15 |
|
| 5:16 |
|
| 5:20 |
|
| 5:28 |
|
Below is live coverage of the Igniting Viral Campaigns from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Barry Schwartz of RustyBrick.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
/* Adjust the height to best suite your page */ /* Remove height property to have all text show without scrollbars. */ #cil_page .mainchat { position: relative; overflow: auto; } scrollpos[1]) { divtop = document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } else { divtop = scrollpos[1] - document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').offsetTop + document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.left = divleft + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.top = divtop + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'inline'; } function cil_closeLayer(){ if (document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display != 'none') { document.getElementById('cil_divsrc').innerHTML = ''; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'none'; } } function cil_replaceString(oldS, newS, fullS) { for (var i = 0; i 0) { position = [document.documentElement.scrollLeft,document.documentElement.scrollTop]; } else if (typeof document.body.scrollTop != 'undefined') { position = [document.body.scrollLeft,document.body.scrollTop]; } return position; } function cil_getCurrentStyle(elem, prop) { if( elem.currentStyle ) { var ar = prop.match(/w[^-]*/g); var s = ar[0]; for(var i = 1; i
| Igniting Viral Campaigns | (12/08/2009) |
| Close |
| 2:26 |
|
| 2:26 |
|
| 2:28 |
|
| 2:29 |
|
| 2:33 |
|
| 2:35 |
|
| 2:35 |
|
| 2:36 |
|
| 2:38 |
|
| 2:38 |
|
| 2:38 |
|
| 2:39 |
|
| 2:41 |
|
| 2:42 |
|
| 2:43 |
|
| 2:43 |
|
| 2:44 |
|
| 2:44 |
|
| 2:45 |
|
| 2:45 |
|
| 2:46 |
|
| 2:47 |
|
| 2:48 |
|
| 2:51 |
|
| 2:51 |
|
| 2:51 |
|
| 2:52 |
|
| 2:52 |
|
| 2:54 |
|
| 2:54 |
|
| 2:55 |
|
| 2:55 |
| 2:56 |
|
| 2:56 |
| 2:57 |
|
| 2:57 |
|
| 2:58 |
|
| 2:59 |
|
| 3:00 |
|
| 3:01 |
|
| 3:01 |
|
| 3:04 |
|
| 3:04 |
|
| 3:06 |
|
| 3:08 |
|
| 3:09 |
|
| 3:11 |
|
| 3:12 |
|
| 3:15 |
|
| 3:19 |
|
| 3:20 |
|
| 3:21 |
|
| 3:24 |
|
| 3:29 |
|
| 3:31 |
|
Below is live coverage of the Landing Page Optimization: The 7 Deadly Sins from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Brian Ussery - Beu Blog.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
Landing Page Optimization: The 7 Deadly Sins
Below is live coverage of the Real Time SEO: No More Yesterday's News from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Barry Schwartz of RustyBrick & Marty Weintraub from aimClear.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
/* Adjust the height to best suite your page */ /* Remove height property to have all text show without scrollbars. */ #cil_page .mainchat { position: relative; overflow: auto; } scrollpos[1]) { divtop = document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } else { divtop = scrollpos[1] - document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').offsetTop + document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.left = divleft + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.top = divtop + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'inline'; } function cil_closeLayer(){ if (document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display != 'none') { document.getElementById('cil_divsrc').innerHTML = ''; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'none'; } } function cil_replaceString(oldS, newS, fullS) { for (var i = 0; i 0) { position = [document.documentElement.scrollLeft,document.documentElement.scrollTop]; } else if (typeof document.body.scrollTop != 'undefined') { position = [document.body.scrollLeft,document.body.scrollTop]; } return position; } function cil_getCurrentStyle(elem, prop) { if( elem.currentStyle ) { var ar = prop.match(/w[^-]*/g); var s = ar[0]; for(var i = 1; i
| Real Time SEO: No More Yesterday's News | (12/08/2009) |
| Close |
| 1:02 |
|
| 1:03 |
|
| 1:08 |
|
| 1:09 |
|
| 1:09 |
|
| 1:09 |
|
| 1:09 |
|
| 1:16 |
|
| 1:19 |
|
| 1:20 |
|
| 1:21 |
|
| 1:21 |
|
| 1:22 |
|
| 1:22 |
|
| 1:23 |
|
| 1:23 |
|
| 1:24 |
|
| 1:25 |
|
| 1:26 |
|
| 1:28 |
|
| 1:30 |
|
| 1:30 |
|
| 1:30 |
|
| 1:31 |
|
| 1:33 |
|
| 1:34 |
|
| 1:34 |
|
| 1:35 |
|
| 1:35 |
|
| 1:36 |
|
| 1:37 |
|
| 1:38 |
|
| 1:39 |
|
| 1:39 |
|
| 1:40 |
|
| 1:41 |
|
| 1:42 |
|
| 1:42 |
|
| 1:43 |
|
| 1:43 |
|
| 1:44 |
|
| 1:44 |
|
| 1:45 |
|
| 1:47 |
|
| 1:48 |
|
| 1:49 |
|
| 1:50 |
|
| 1:50 |
|
| 1:51 |
|
| 1:54 |
|
Below is live coverage of the Social Media Checklist from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Barry Schwartz of RustyBrick.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
/* Adjust the height to best suite your page */ /* Remove height property to have all text show without scrollbars. */ #cil_page .mainchat { position: relative; overflow: auto; } scrollpos[1]) { divtop = document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } else { divtop = scrollpos[1] - document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').offsetTop + document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.left = divleft + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.top = divtop + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'inline'; } function cil_closeLayer(){ if (document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display != 'none') { document.getElementById('cil_divsrc').innerHTML = ''; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'none'; } } function cil_replaceString(oldS, newS, fullS) { for (var i = 0; i 0) { position = [document.documentElement.scrollLeft,document.documentElement.scrollTop]; } else if (typeof document.body.scrollTop != 'undefined') { position = [document.body.scrollLeft,document.body.scrollTop]; } return position; } function cil_getCurrentStyle(elem, prop) { if( elem.currentStyle ) { var ar = prop.match(/w[^-]*/g); var s = ar[0]; for(var i = 1; i
| Social Media Checklist | (12/08/2009) |
| Close |
| 10:23 |
|
| 10:24 |
|
| 10:28 |
|
| 10:29 |
|
| 10:30 |
|
| 10:32 |
|
| 10:33 |
|
| 10:35 |
|
| 10:36 |
|
| 10:37 |
|
| 10:37 |
|
| 10:39 |
|
| 10:40 |
|
| 10:40 |
|
| 10:43 |
|
| 10:43 |
|
| 10:45 |
|
| 10:46 |
|
| 10:47 |
|
| 10:49 |
|
| 10:49 |
|
| 10:50 |
|
| 10:50 |
|
| 10:52 |
|
| 10:53 |
|
| 10:53 |
|
| 10:53 |
|
| 10:53 |
|
| 10:55 |
|
| 10:55 |
|
| 10:56 |
|
| 10:56 |
|
| 10:57 |
|
| 10:59 |
|
| 11:00 |
|
| 11:00 |
|
| 11:00 |
|
| 11:02 |
|
| 11:03 |
|
| 11:04 |
|
| 11:04 |
|
| 11:05 |
|
| 11:06 |
|
| 11:07 |
|
| 11:07 |
|
| 11:08 |
|
| 11:09 |
|
| 11:09 |
|
| 11:10 |
|
| 11:10 |
|
| 11:10 |
|
| 11:11 | Do you have a dedicated person to manage your social media? Yes - Employee ( 0% )Yes, Myself ( 100% )No ( 0% )Not yet, but I will ( 0% ) Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:11 |
| 11:12 |
|
| 11:13 |
|
| 11:15 |
|
| 11:16 | Have Social Media Best Practices Changed from now to 2008? Yes, it Changed ( 0% )No, it is the Same ( 100% ) Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:16 |
| 11:17 |
|
| 11:18 |
|
| 11:22 |
|
| 11:23 |
|
| 11:25 |
|
Below is live coverage of the Developments in Information Retrieval on the Web from the SES Chicago 2009 (official SES Chicago Site) conference.
This coverage is provided by Brian Ussery - Beu Blog & Marty Weintraub from aimClear.
We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.
/* Adjust the height to best suite your page */ /* Remove height property to have all text show without scrollbars. */ #cil_page .mainchat { position: relative; overflow: auto; } scrollpos[1]) { divtop = document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } else { divtop = scrollpos[1] - document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').offsetTop + document.getElementById('cil_mainholder').scrollTop + 40; } document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.left = divleft + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.top = divtop + 'px'; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'inline'; } function cil_closeLayer(){ if (document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display != 'none') { document.getElementById('cil_divsrc').innerHTML = ''; document.getElementById('cil_modalitem').style.display = 'none'; } } function cil_replaceString(oldS, newS, fullS) { for (var i = 0; i 0) { position = [document.documentElement.scrollLeft,document.documentElement.scrollTop]; } else if (typeof document.body.scrollTop != 'undefined') { position = [document.body.scrollLeft,document.body.scrollTop]; } return position; } function cil_getCurrentStyle(elem, prop) { if( elem.currentStyle ) { var ar = prop.match(/w[^-]*/g); var s = ar[0]; for(var i = 1; i
| Developments in Information Retrieval on the Web | (12/08/2009) |
| Close |
| 10:36 |
|
| 10:43 |
|
| 10:46 |
|
| 10:51 |
|
| 10:55 |
|
| 10:59 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 10:59 |
| 11:01 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:01 |
| 11:02 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:02 |
| 11:03 |
|
| 11:08 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:08 |
| 11:08 |
|
| 11:09 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:09 |
| 11:10 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:10 |
| 11:10 |
|
| 11:11 |
|
| 11:13 |
|
| 11:19 |
|
| 11:22 |
|
| 11:23 |
|
| 11:23 |
|
| 11:24 |
|
| 11:24 |
|
| 11:25 |
|
| 11:26 |
|
| 11:27 |
|
| 11:28 | Tuesday December 8, 2009 11:28 |
| 11:30 |
|
| 11:31 |
|
| 11:36 |
|
| 11:38 |
|
| 11:41 |
|
Google has announced they are now legally going after those companies who have been scamming unsuspecting people since March of this year. We first wrote about the Google Money Scams in March, then in June the scams got worse. In July, Google warned the public about these scams but still many fell for it. Some scammers took to the phone to scam more and more people. They even began banning scammers from AdWords in July and continued that bans throughout. In fact, they recently stepped up the bans and made them permanent, even this month there was a big ban event.
Google said they filed suit against Pacific WebWorks (here is PDF of complaint). Google said, "To fight back, we're working to stop various fraudulent "Google Money" schemes, and this week filed suit against Pacific WebWorks and several other unnamed defendants."
It is sad to see it got this bad where this had to happen, but I am glad Google is taking serious action.
Forum discussion at Google AdSense Help.
Google also announced that they are sending out stickers to be placed in shop windows that have QR barcodes. The goal is to allow people to scan the sticker and look up more information about that place.
You can see some samples of these businesses in LA over here. How do you get one of these stickers for your business? Well, make sure you are a verified business on Google Local Business Center. Make sure to complete your profile to the T. Then, it is up to Google. TechCrunch reports Google has "PlaceRank" algorithm to determine in which order do businesses get these decals.
Google will be adding these businesses incrementally. "They are selected based on their PlaceRank," says John Hanke, VP of Google Earth, Maps, and Local. PlaceRank is like PageRank for places It tries to figure out how prominent a place is based on factors such as "references on the Web, reviews, photos," says Hanke, "how many people know about it, how long its been around."
Bill from SEO By The Sea covered this PlaceRank algorithm years ago.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Tony Ruscoe, the co-editor at Google Blogoscoped has confirmed he will be joining the Google team next month. Tony has been writing at Google Blogoscoped since 2006, he has broken so many stories by digging deep into Google and finding tons of hidden treasures.
Tony is becoming a Googler in January 2010. He will be working in Google's London office as part of the Google Webmaster Team. He said he is not exactly sure what he will be working on at Google yet, but likely in the same role as JohnMu who also joined Google from the webmaster ranks back in August 2007. John has been a huge asset to the webmaster community before and even more so after joining Google.
Googlers are obviously delighted to have Tony join the team there. A Google Blogoscoped Forums thread has comments from Googlers. Matt Cutts said, "w00t! I'm so excited that you're joining Google. :) I can see it now: "Day 1: Clean up the home page a bit. Make sure it's smaller but validates. Day 2: ..." :)" JohnMu said:
Congratulations, Tony! I'm excited to see that you're coming aboard & really looking forward to catching you in London or perhaps on a visit to the Zuerich office :-).
Tom, if you have worked out how cloning works, I have a list of names ... :-)
Tony, the webmasters will miss you as being part of the team but I am sure we will all benefit more from you moving over to Google.
Forum discussion at Google Blogoscoped Forums.
Part of Google's blitz of announcements yesterday were several mobile announcements including a really neat feature named Google Goggles.
Google Goggles basically lets you snap pictures on your Android mobile device and Google will return search results based on that picture. It works best with landmarks, books, contact information, artwork, places, wines and logos. Here is a video on how it works:
Other announcements include Search by Voice in other languages, such as Japanese, English and Mandarin. Search by Location on Android, and Search by Sight which is Google Goggles.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and Google Mobile Help.
Google announced a dozen things yesterday, but one of those announcements was on real time search in the search results. Google teamed up with Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, FriendFeed, Jaiku and Identi.ca to make these real time search results possible.
In short, Google sticks another "universal result" in the search results when they feel a real time result makes sense. For example, a search for popeye, which is currently trending due to the Google Doodle Popeye logo, shows this real time result:
Yes, that is my tweet showing a link to this site. In fact, it also shows other Tweeting links to my story. Here is a link to the real time landing page results.
Here is a video explaining this in more detail:
We have threads on this announcement at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums. The consensus in the threads are that this clutters up the search results even more and do not provide a simple interface for people to find relevant results. Of course, most SEOs don't want their web results pushed down in the search results page - but SEOs will adapt and use Twitter, Facebook and so on to make sure their results do show up in that area when applicable.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.
If you visit Google today, you will see a logo of Popeye. The logo is to celebrate Popeye's creator, E. C. Segar's 115th birthday. E. C. Segar was born on December 8, 1894. Popeye, the character, was first introduced on January 17, 1929 in a comic strip Thimble Theatre, which was renamed to Popeye later (I believe).
In any event, the logo on the Google.com home page looks like this:
Google typically only shows Google Doodles for light hearted events, such as this. Which is why there was no Doodle for Pearl Harbor yesterday, December 7th. But it did not stop dozens of complaints in the Google Web Search Help Forums.
Forum discussion on Popeye at Google Webmaster Help and DigitalPoint Forums.
SEMs should do their best to represent search marketers in this top 100 marketers vote. There are lots of Internet marketers listed on this list, some are SEOs and SEMs, so go vote for them.
Shameless plug: If you like, vote for me, I may have the most hats on that list:
Barry Schwartz of Search Engine Roundtable, Search Engine Land, RustyBrick (@Rustybrick)
If you do not like me, then vote for another SEM. Keep it in the family!
Forum discussion at Sphinn.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
I am writing this weekly recap while on a flight to Chicago. I won't be able to do the video version, so hopefully this text version will do. I am on my way to Chicago for Search Engine Strategies 2009. SES is actually when I started this site, six years ago on December 2nd. We have written over 10,000 stories here since and almost 2,000 in the past year alone.
On the search front, Google's Caffeine index finally made it to a data center. Google added a site performance report to Webmaster Tools to show off page speed. Google also confirmed a Sitelinks bug where you can link to a competitor. On the user interface front, Google decided to go with the fade in home page. They are showing more breadcrumbs as site URLs. They also are using larger images in the search results and region tags for some of the results. Bing went offline for the first time in their short history, it latest for 30 minutes. Bing Maps showed Google they can compete by adding street views and augmented reality. There are stories that Yahoo has begun unbanning web sites from their index. Google AdSense banned a publisher for copyright infringement over their own copyright. Finally, there are tons of more AdWords bans going on right now - I called it the Big Ban of December. That was this past week at the Search Engine Roundtable.
Select Topics For This Past Week:
Misc:
Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!
Google announced the launch of the Google Public DNS service, which is a free public domain name system. It is a lot like OpenDNS, but without any of the administrative controls for blocking sites or redirecting mismatched domains to a special landing page (which is where OpenDNS makes their money).
Google's DNS IPs are pretty sweet, they are 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. If you want to use it, here are the configuration instructions.
Google said they are doing this for one reason and one reason alone. To make the web faster. Google knows which sites are the most popular out there and they will precache those pages so it doesn't have to be done at the time of the DNS request. Most DNS servers cache sites based on the last time a user of theirs accessed it, Google will anticipate that without usage - at this point. Google likes speed, as we discussed time and time again over here.
Google is convinced you will like their DNS server because it will speed things up, make things more secure and they won't do any type of redirection at all.
You think Google will use the data to track you? Well, Google very specifically detailed what they will be tracking and for how long. The "temporary logs" contain IP level information, but Google will destroy "temporary logs within 24 to 48 hours." However, Google will be storing specific information on an aggregate level, those details can be found here.
As I said, webmasters are wary and there is a long WebmasterWorld thread with comments:
With it being such an easy way to track who goes where, I'm surprised Google is just getting into this now.
Would this really benefit anyone besides Google?
Reading their gumph, they claim that having a large, common caching database will mean faster performance for all, but is it really worth the slight boost in performance in exchange for giving Google even more of your data?
Google claim that their service will attempt to send users to their geographically closest data centre.
But I still reckon it's wisest to just stick with your own ISP's DNS offering, unless you know what you're doing.
Personally, I use OpenDNS because of the security and the ability to block access to specific sites on the DNS level - which is nice. Would I switch? Who knows. But I do like how the OpenDNS blog responded to this Google news, "to think that Google’s DNS service is for the benefit of the Internet would be naive." Now that is classic!
Forum discussion WebmasterWorld.
Every year Google gives some of their AdWords advertisers and AdSense publishers holiday gifts. Typically, the gifts are delivered by now - but not one advertiser or publisher have posted in a forum or on a blog about receiving a holiday gift from Google this year.
A WebmasterWorld thread wonders if there will be any gifts this year or not. This year was the "great recession," but Google is clearly back in spend mode (if you watch their business activities closely, you would notice this).
In the past four years, the gifts were typically received by this week. Last year, the gifts were received by December 3, 2008, then by December 4, 2007, in November 2006, the latest was the second week of December 2005, but typically, we get them by this week in December.
Do you think there will be holiday gifts from Google?
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Are you frustrated with Google AdSense? Do you love them? Do you have ideas that you think would improve the product or service? If so, Google is now asking for feedback on Google AdSense. Do not submit the ideas here, you have to go to a Google Moderator area and submit your ideas there.
AdSense Pro Jennifer said in a Google AdSense Help thread:
I just wanted to let you know that we've launched an AdSense Product Ideas page on Google Moderator. It's a great way to get your ideas heard, vote on other publishers' suggestions, and share your thoughts on AdSense product updates. As the blog announcement says, "While we aren't able to guarantee that all the ideas on this page will be implemented, we can guarantee that we'll take the top ideas (as voted by you), and bring them to the AdSense Product Management team for review. By submitting an idea, you agree that Google may use the idea to develop and enhance Google's products and services."
Again, if you have ideas for Google on AdSense, don't comment here, go to the Google Moderator area and submit your ideas or vote on ideas.
Forum discussion at Google AdSense Help.
As you know, Google promised to ban AdWords advertisers at a higher rate and began doing so in late September and throughout November but promised to really step it up later last month.
I spotted a new thread at Google AdWords Help which has what appears to be dozens of advertisers who started getting banned yesterday, December 3rd, at the stroke of midnight. So when it turned into December 3rd, it seems like a bunch of automatic bans just went out and impacted tons of advertisers. There are also ongoing discussion about these bans at WebmasterWorld.
So it looks like a new Google strike on AdWords advertisers has come down.
Here is a copy of a ban email from Google these days:
Dear advertiser,
We are writing to let you know that your Google AdWords account has been disabled due to one or more serious violations of our advertising policies related to Landing Page and Site Quality. As a result, your ads will no longer run through the Google AdWords system and we are unable to accept advertising from you in the future. Please note that future accounts you open will also be disabled.
As part of our commitment to making the AdWords experience safe and effective for our users and our advertisers, we routinely review the landing pages that our advertisers promote through our search and content networks. If we find that an advertiser has submitted a landing page that egregiously violates our policies, we reserve the right to take immediate account-level action.
Landing pages advertised via AdWords must have relevant, original content, and must be transparent about the nature of the business being promoted. Further, advertising certain types of sites will lead to immediate account disabling. These types of sites include, but are not limited to:
* Sites that charge users or collect personal information in exchange for a product that is never delivered
* Sites that charge for "free" software
* Sites that trick users into paying for fake or poor-quality content
* Sites that charge users for information that makes unrealistic promises of financial or personal gain
* Sites that install malware software on a visitor's computer
Please note that this action is related to sites that have recently been advertised through your account. In a review of your account history, we found that your account had submitted a least one site that egregiously violated our advertising policies. Although you may have removed these sites since our latest review, advertisers that have a history of promoting these types of sites are still subject to account-level disabling.You can review our Advertising Policies, including our Landing Page and Site Quality guidelines, by visiting: http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=en&page=guidelines.cs
You may also review the complete AdWords Terms & Conditions here: https://adwords.google.com/select/tsandcsfinder
In addition, our FAQ about Account Disablings can be found here: https://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=164786If you have additional questions or concerns not addressed by our policies or help center, you can contact support by replying to this email.
Sincerely,
The Google AdWords team
Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help & WebmasterWorld.
Bing went offline for about 30 minutes. I captured a screen shot of Microsoft's search engine having issues about mid-way through. Here it is:
TechCrunch said it was down for about 30 minutes. Twitter was buzzing about the news, and there were threads at Bing Community & WebmasterWorld.
Bing tweeted when they came back online:
This may be the first time that Bing.com has been down in its relatively short history.
Forum discussion at Bing Community & WebmasterWorld.
Update: Bing blog has a post on this.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Like all you know, page speed with be a ranking factor in Google in 2010 and if you didn't believe it until now, maybe Google adding a page speed report to Google Webmaster Tools will convince you of that.
I figured I show you detailed screen shots of how slow this site is, using this tool.
As you can see from the chart below, this site is slower than 86% of the other sites on the Internet. The chart does slow slight improvement, but clearly, I need to clean things up here - quick.
Then Google shows me example load times for specific pages on my site:
Then Google offers speed suggestions:
I can drill down deeper on a specific page to see exactly what is suggested:
Figured I slam my own site over someone elses - why not.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help and WebmasterWorld.
Back in October, Google began testing the fade in home page and they tried several variations over the course of the time. Google has finally decided to go ahead with this look and feature for simplistically purposes.
The Google blog announced it last night. They admitted some of those tests were failures and they even admitted they were worried making this the default look. Here is how Marissa phrased it:
All in all, we ran approximately 10 variants of the fade-in. Some of the experiments hindered the user experience: for example, the variants of the homepage that hid the search buttons until after the fade performed the worst in terms of user happiness metrics. Other variants of the experiment produced humorous outcomes when combined with our doodles — the barcode doodle combined with the fade was particularly ironic in its overstated minimalism. However, in the end, the variant of the homepage we are launching today was positive or neutral on all key metrics, except one: time to first action. At first, this worried us a bit: Google is all about getting you where you are going faster — how could we launch something that potentially slowed users down? Then, we realized: we want users to notice this change... and it does take time to notice something (though in this case, only milliseconds!). Our goal then became to understand whether or not over time the users began to use the homepage even more efficiently than the control group and, sure enough, that was the trend we observed.
Here is a picture of the fade in choice selected:
So they kept the search buttons there right away. But many still hate it, I have at least five recent threads with lots of complaints about this new look. I'll link to them below.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
About two weeks ago, Google introduced breadcrumb display URLs in the search results. It was suppose to be for "small percentage of search results" but they are showing up quiet often. Google said they are doing this for URLs that are "too long, too short, or too obscure to add useful information." So Google adds the useful information for you.
Not all webmasters agree that Google is improving their URL structure with the display URL as a breadcrumb. A WebmasterWorld thread has some webmasters complaining and I know, WebmasterWorld doesn't allow examples. So for you Googlers out there that want examples, I'll give you one.
A search for [rustybrick siddur] brings up this new breadcrumb URL. It looks like this:
Now, if this was smart, it would either leave my URL alone, because I feel it is pretty short and very descriptive the way it is. Or Google would show the true breadcrumb which is > iPhone Apps > Siddur as shown here:
Now, it works beautifully for [rustybrick iphone] but even there, is it really needed to change the display URL from rustybrick.com/iphone.php to rustybrick.com > iPhone Apps? I am not too sure.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Google announced two changes to the search results. The first is larger images in the search results for some searches and the second is region tags in the search results. Let me explain both.
The larger images may show up in the search results, when Google thinks an image should be highlighted. For example, the before and after:
Before:
After:
Google also announced a new regional tag that will show up in certain situations in the Google search results. The region tags tell the searcher that the site is from a specific country or region. This region tag will only show on about 1% of the search results, Google said. And they have to meet these criteria:
We currently show region tags only for certain domains such as .com and .net where the location information would otherwise be unclear. We don't show region tags for results on domains like .br for Brazil, because the location is already implied by the green URL line in our default display. In addition, we only display region tags when the region supplied by the site owner is different from the domain where the search was entered.
Here is a picture:
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Microsoft made buzz yesterday with the announcements on the Bing Maps blog and Bing Search Blog.
Greg Sterling explains it well at Search Engine Land as "Bing Maps breaks new ground in online mapping even as it plays a bit of catch up with Google."
The augmented reality comes in where Microsoft overlays data on those maps in a more social way. Microsoft explains:
Photosynth and Silverlight are the underlying technologies in Bing Maps that connect everything and help provide the more seamless experience. Based on Seadragon and Photo Tourism concepts, Photosynth lets us literally “stitch” together photographs to provide more realistic view of locations as they appear in real life. Photosynth-enabled Streetside imagery is built on geometric models that are reconstructed underneath the imagery to provide a truly 3D experience that shows locations as they are in real life.
The screen shots at the various blogs are neat, the only downside is the requirement to install Silverlight (I am a mac user). For more coverage of this, see Techmeme.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Today is the official six-year anniversary of the Search Engine Roundtable. To date, we have written over 10,700 (10,740 to be exact) articles here, and over 1,841 in the past year. But it is not about the quantity of posts, I feel we have always produced unique and useful content, day in and day out here for the past six years. If we couldn't provide unique and helpful content, I doubt I would be keeping this up. And like I always say, the content comes from the community (i.e. the forums), which has always determined what we write about and what I feel is important to highlight to a wider audience.
This article, being my 7,958th article since starting this site (1,754 over past year) will highlight some of what I feel are the most important changes over the course of the year in our industry. If you want to see the same type of post for the 2008 year, see my five year anniversary write up from last year.
I would like to thank all our contributing authors, the volunteer live conference bloggers, our sponsors, the search engines, and of course - you guys - the community. Finally, I would like to thank my wife for putting up with my addiction to search, especially after having our first child.
A quick reminder, if you have not yet subscribed to us via RSS or email, please consider doing so. Also, please consider subscribing to our weekly video recaps and on Twitter at both @seroundtable and @rustybrick.
Enough of that, let's get into the meat of the past year:
Is it possible that Yahoo is unbanning web sites from Yahoo Search after years of being in the penalty box? A single post by an old time member at WebmasterWorld claims that two of his sites are now back in the Yahoo index after years.
He said:
Just noticed today two of our sites that were previously banned in Yahoo for 2+ years are now receiving traffic once again from Yahoo and are being reindexed. Anybode else noticing their sites being reindexed? Traffic was first noticed on the 25th of November.
Did anyone else notice that their sites that were banned from Yahoo is now back?
Again, this is a single post from one webmaster - so I am trying to see if this is a single incident or a larger one. Please join the thread or comment here.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Sphinn has a new News Editor, his name is Matt McGee, I am sure you have heard of him. Matt is a huge U2 fan, loves SEO (especially local SEO), he is the assignment editor at Search Engine Land and is now the new Sphinn News Editor. He replaces Rob Kerry who has been Sphinn's news editor for over two years now.
Both Rob and Matt are loved in the community. Rob promises in a Sphinn thread that he will continue to be active in the community. Rob said:
I'm sad to announce that I will be stepping down as Editor of Sphinn, as of today. I will however continue to take an active part in the Sphinn community and will stay on as part of the Moderator team.
Rob then announced Matt as his successor in another Sphinn thread:
Please join me in welcoming Sphinn's new Editor, Matt McGee. Matt is a familiar face to Sphinn, having already served as a Moderator and now moving up to manage the site overall.
Good to know Rob isn't going far! Best of luck Matt in the new role!
Forum discussion at Sphinn - Rob Leaving & Sphinn - Matt Joining.
Yesterday, Google adjusted their First Click Free program and wrote about it at both the Google Webmaster Central Blog and the Google News Blog.
In the past, the first click free program allowed you to show subscription content to Google even if you required users to login. The only requirement was that when users clicked from Google to the article, they should be able to see the content without having to pay or login. After that first click from Google, you can require them to login. The only issue was that anyone wanting to see any article on a paid subscription site, would simply go to Google and click over to the article from Google to the site to get it for free.
Google adjusted their policy to allow publishers to limit the clicks to the "five free accesses per user each day." So after five clicks, the publisher can decide to require that user to login. Google does not determine how to calculate or code the first five free accesses per user, and leaves it up to the webmaster to figure out. So that means you will have some publishers who are more lax on that rule, allowing more than five and some might allow up to five in whatever 24 hour period they decide. Do they use cookies, IPs, or something else to track that access, that is up to the webmaster/publisher.
The first click free program is old, it dates back past 2007 or further, as far as I know. In mid-2008, there was confusion if it could be used in web search as well and the ultimate decision is that is applies both to News and Web search.
For more technical details on this program, click here.
Forum discussion at Google News Help and WebmasterWorld.
An interesting WebmasterWorld thread where e-commerce owners are claiming that even if they pull their PPC spend, their e-commerce earnings remain the same. Let me quote you some of the posts in the thread:
That quote is from another poster on another thread but we've done about the same thing in recent months and have seen only INCREASED revenue and profits. We do get bought traffic from G (at great expense) but very, very few orders.We start PPC, stop it, start again, time after time and I never see much difference except in the buckets of ad cash we save whenever we stop.
We have reduced our PPC by about 50%, and have seen no discernable difference, our sales are about the same or better. We cut it down back in September and checked the stats today, and could see no real difference either way that I could attribute to PPC or lack of.
Over the next couple weeks I am going to reduce it a LOT more. Giving up on the "big" keywords, and anything that we show up in search results for. Going to target a bunch of the "down in the mud" keywords - those that usually sell for about 10-20 cents - for specific brand items and part numbers.
I am never a fan of relying solely on SEO or PPC alone. One day, your site can be hit by a Google update and drop in the rankings and with no PPC, you can suffer big time. Same on the reverse side - you just don't want to have all your eggs in one basket.
Curious, have you increased or decreased your spend in the past six years? Take our poll and use the comments to explain if you saw any change in revenue due to those PPC changes.
Spending Less on PPC Ads in Past 6 Months?(answers)
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Yesterday, we highlighted a Google Suggest result for I Am Extremely Terrified Of Chinese People. Today, I spotted a new one via Google Web Search Help forums, where someone noticed that if you type in to Google, [little kids], Google then suggests the following results:
Here is a screen shot:
Jem from Google appreciated the report and said:
Thanks for reporting this to me -- I'll take a look.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
Update: I am glad to see Google removed these suggestions soon after I wrote about them.
About two weeks ago, we reported on rumors of Sitelinks linking to the wrong site. Well, those rumors have just been confirmed by a Googler.
JohnMu in a Google Webmaster Help thread confirmed a long standing rumor where a Sitelink, can link to a third-party site, likely a competitor. John said:
This looks like something that happened long ago because of a bug on our side that's persisted because you're blocking the Sitelinks. Once you unblock them, they can go away on their own :). Sorry about the confusion!
So yes, there was a bug when you blocked a Sitelink that you did not want. You had to unblock them to make the Sitelink go away. Go figure.
I doubt most people will know how to do this or even think this is logical, so I do hope the bug is fixed and Google does this for all sites that are impacted.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.
Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.
Did you know that the first conference we ever covered here was SES Chicago and that back six years ago in 2003? Since then we covered this conference every year but last. And we will be covering SES Chicago 2009 this year. For our past years coverage see SES Chicago 2003, SES Chicago 2004, SES Chicago 2005, SES Chicago 2006 and SES Chicago 2007. Next week, Monday, December 7th starts SES Chicago 2009.
We have several volunteers that will be helping with the live blog coverage on the CoverItLive tool. They include Brian Ussery aka Beussery, Marty Weintraub from aimClear, Chris Boggs of Rosetta and myself.
Here is our coverage schedule, which is subject to change at the last minute:
Monday, December 7 - Day 1
9:00am-10:15am
Jeff Jarvis, Author of What Would Google Do? covered by Barry Schwartz
10:30am-11:30am
Mixed Media SERPs covered by Barry Schwartz
Search Analytics covered by Brian Ussery
Search Industry Today covered by Chris Boggs
11:45am-12:45pm
How to Turn Your Web Analytics Into a Money-Making Machine covered by Brian Ussery
Search: Where to Next? covered by Chris Boggs
1:45pm-2:45pm
Meaningful SEO Metrics: Going Beyond the Numbers covered by Barry Schwartz
3:15pm-4:15pm
SEO Through Blogs & Feeds covered by Barry Schwartz
Search and the Integrated Marketing Mix covered by Chris Boggs
4:30pm-5:30pm
Customer Insights via Search Engine Tools covered by Chris Boggs & Marty Weintraub
Ghost Blogging, Tweeting, Content Production - Ethical? Does It Matter? covered by Barry Schwartz
Tuesday, December 8 - Day 2
10:30am-11:45am
Developments in Information Retrieval on the Web covered by Brian Ussery & Marty Weintraub
Social Media Checklist covered by Barry Schwartz
1:00pm-2:15pm
Real Time SEO: No More Yesterday's News covered by Barry Schwartz & Marty Weintraub
Landing Page Optimization: The 7 Deadly Sins covered by Brian Ussery
2:30pm-3:45pm
Igniting Viral Campaigns covered by Barry Schwartz
4:15pm-5:30pm
How to Speak Geek: Working Collaboratively With Your IT Department to Achieve Business Goals covered by Chris Boggs
Turning Simple Change into Big Profit covered by Brian Ussery
Cool Mobile Apps, Augmented Reality - It's a Brave New World! covered by Barry Schwartz
Wednesday, December 9 - Day 3
9:00am-10:00am
Keynote: Dan Siroker, Former Deputy New Media Director, Obama Transition Team and Founder, CarrotSticks covered by Barry Schwartz
10:30am-11:45am
PPC or SEO? The Ultimate Search Marketing Battle covered by Chris Boggs & Barry Schwartz
12:45pm-2:00pm
Facebook Rockstars RoundTable: Marketing For the Other Internet covered by Barry Schwartz & Brian Ussery
2:30pm-3:45pm
Search Becomes the Display OS covered by Barry Schwartz
For those that will be there, I look forward to seeing you. For those that cannot make it, I hope we are covering the sessions you most want to hear about.
If you visit Google, Yahoo or Ask.com today, you will see they are all honoring World AIDS Day with a red bow on their logo or on their home page. Bing, AOL, DogPile and others seem to be missing the mention today (we may put something up later).
Google has a ribbon under the search box which links to google.org/world-aids-day-2009.html (yes, Google.org):
Yahoo has an animated logo which links to yahoo.com/worldaidsday/:
Flash Version:
Static Version:
Ask.com is the only one linking to a search result (go figure):
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.
Recently, Google opened product AdWords ads all U.S. based advertisers and merchants. So now, if you use Google Merchant Center (aka Google Base), you can tie your AdWords account to it and show those fancy product images, pricing and so on, in your AdWords ads.
A WebmasterWorld thread has some advertisers a bit upset with the matching of the query, ad and the products actually displayed. Some are saying that the products being displayed for the query used is not showing the most relevant products.
Senior member, netmeg said, "Some of the products aren't matched properly (and I looked at some of my competitors, and theirs are even worse - lucky for me!)" A moderator, Buckworks, said "My AdWords rep said the system chooses which product to display based on parameters in the product's description but didn't say what those were and couldn't tell me how they could be tweaked."
Google did mention in their FAQs that you should use the new product extensions attributes to help Google better match the products in your feed to the query and your ads. Google said on that page:
To help us better match your Google Merchant products to search queries, you may attach one or more optional attributes to your Google Merchant Center offers.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
A Google AdSense Help thread reports that an AdSense publisher was banned or disapproved from Google AdSense because the content on their web site is copyrighted. This happens all the time, but in this case, the content that is copyrighted is copyrighted by them and they have the right to use this content - since it is theirs.
The publisher wrote:
I am the one and only owner of the copyright of all my books (they are in print for more than 10 years) presented on my site. However my site hasn't been approved for Google Adsense because "it contains copyrighted material". Yes, the material is copyrighted. But it is copyrighted by me.The email that said that rigmarole to me is "noreply". How can I point out the silly mistake to the Google worker who made it?
You just have to laugh, don't you?
Googler, Jennifer, replied to the thread saying, "I'll look into this and get back to you."
Can't wait to see the outcome. Either this person is lying or something weird is going on.
Forum discussion at Google AdSense Help.
Did you know that there are countries out there that have a dispute on where their border begins and ends? Yea, you know that. But did you know that Google will show different borders depending on how and where you access Google Maps?
A Google Maps Help thread has a post from Brian from the Google Maps team who explains how this works. He said:
It is Google's standard practice to show all disputed regions around the world on its global properties, such as on maps.google.com. It has been Google’s consistent and global policy to depict disputed regions as per the claims made by the disputing/claiming nations on its global properties. This does not in any way endorse or affirm the position taken by any side but merely provides complete information on the prevailing geo-political situation to our users of global properties in a dispassionate and accurate manner. Products that have been localized to the local domain of a region such as maps.google.co.in may depict that country’s position as per the mandate of their local laws.
For example, compare Google India Maps to Google Maps and you will see the border lines look a bit different. Here are screen captures:
Google Maps India, The Border:
Google Maps US, The Border:
Notice the dotted lines in the US map, how it doesn't seem sure.
Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.
If you go to Google.com and just type in [I am] Google will then offer as the third suggestion, "I Am Extremely Terrified Of Chinese People" as a search suggestion. This is not new, it was reported back in February. But back then, you had to type in [I am extremely] to get this search suggestion, now all you need is [I am] to return the search suggestion.
Here is a screen capture:
Yes, Google's search suggestions are completely algorithmic. But Google has been known to remove search suggestions - unlike their policy for not removing search results.
Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.