SEO News » Items by rustybrick

Daily Search Forum Recap: September 2, 2010

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Bing Web Search Update?

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 4:03pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Microsoft MSN Search

This is very very early and I don't have evidence of this myself, since I don't monitor rankings, but a single post at WebmasterWorld suggested there is a Bing update taking place.

textex, someone I trust at the forum, who has been a member of WebmasterWorld for almost ten years now, said:

Looks like an update....

So if there is a Bing update, there is a Yahoo update in the US and Canada.

Did you notice major changes in your Bing rankings?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

How Does Google Maps Decide To Show Labels (Points of Interest)?

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:46pm CEST by rustybrick

Yesterday I reported Google is testing "sponsored map icons" in the US. They are basically enhanced point of interest icons using the company's logo, instead of the basic POI (point of interest) icon Google uses on the map views.

Here you can see some POI icons, also known as "labels." They include a doctor icon, a bed and breakfast icon, a synagogue icon, a lawyer office icon and them some generic squares.

Clearly, when you define your business category in Google Places, Google knows which icon to show for your business. But why are only these businesses showing? There are literally dozens of businesses near mine, which is RustyBrick. I work in an office building, so why is RustyBrick shown and not the 100 or so other businesses here?

Google has a help document that explains:

The place labels shown on Google Maps are determined algorithmically based on a large number of factors, so there is no way to guarantee placement of your business on the map as a place label. One factor these algorithms consider is the accuracy of the business listing and the richness of the content associated with the listing, so you can improve the chances that your business will receive a place label if you claim it in Google Places.

Right, that doesn't say much, does it? But when I spoke with Google Product Manager, Matthew Leske yesterday, he dropped some hints as to how Google decides which icons to show at what level. He told me the following factors go into making this up:

Google looks at the listings:

Quantity of citations
Is there Wikipedia entry (he specifically mentioned that)
Search volume for business
and "other relevant information"

He explained it is more like a web search relevancy algorithm than anything else.

Forum discussion at Google Places Help.

Sphinn Drops Voting & SEO Community Revolts

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:39pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: SEO Forum News

I doubt you missed the big SEO community news from yesterday. Danny Sullivan announced in a Sphinn thread that Sphinn will be going the editorial route and be removing voting. Instead, editors will decide what should be on the front page and not users.

Users can still submit content, but editors have the final say on what makes it to the front page of Sphinn. The goal is to have hand picked content that the community can discuss, as opposed to have users vote on content submitted by anyone. Read Danny's full explanation for more details.

The community, at least the ones upset with the decision, were extremely vocal about their dislike of this decision. Some are saying that the moderators will only allow their "friends" content on the front page. Some are saying that taking away voting removes the core of the Sphinn site. Some are saying that this just makes it one more discussion forum. Personally, I have no idea - but I'd like to see how this model works.

What do you think? Here is an anonymous poll:

Does Removing Voting From Sphinn Kill It?online survey

There are many threads and blog posts about it, most linked to in the primary Sphinn thread.

Forum discussion at several Sphinn threads.

Google Webmaster Tools Bug Prevented Unverifying Users

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:27pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Some users have recently been having difficultly removing verified users in Google Webmaster Tools. Google allows you to give multiple users access to view your Google Webmaster Tools reports and data.

Sometimes you want to revoke access to some of those users. To do that, you go "Add or remove owners" on the Webmaster Tools homepage and click "unverify."

But that was not working for the past couple days. Google admitted the bug and said it was fixed last night in a Google Webmaster Help thread. Dennis G. from Google said:

We had a bug in our server that blocked follow-up "unverify" requests, so it was impossible to remove that "Unverification pending" warning. It should be fixed now, so just click that "unverify" link one last time. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

GoogleBot Crawling Less or More Efficiently?

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:21pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

The obsessed (in a cool geeky way) webmasters at WebmasterWorld are discussing recent patterns they noticed with how Google's spider, GoogleBot has been accessing their site recently.

One said GoogleBot is crawling 50% less than it normally does. Others are saying they are just seeing GoogleBot crawl differently, but not less, per say. In addition, another person said Google stop crawling almost completely, but that is likely another issue.

Tedster explained what he has recently seen:

The sites I work with have been showing a changed crawling pattern since June, but it's not really a reduced crawl. On average more pages are being spidered over any extended period, but the whole pattern contains more spikes - occurring on about a 7-8 day cycle.

Have you noticed new or different GoogleBot crawling behavior?

We did report GoogleBot crawling from multiple locations at the same time, them having new crawling issues and acting all weird recently. Remember, this may all be caffeine related, so keep that in mind.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Logged In/Out: Google Keyword Tool Gives Different Results

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 2:58pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdWords

Sheara Goldenthal pinged me with a question yesterday about why the Google Keyword Tool shows different search volume data for the same keyword phrase, when she is logged in versus not logged into her AdWords account.

It is a great question, a question I thought I knew the solid answer for. I am sure I read it somewhere, so I dug a bit deeper. It seems like this is a popular question asked in several forums, including HighRankings Forums, Warrior Forums and several Google AdWords Help forum.

There is a help document that answers this question:

Why do traffic estimates for my ad group differ from those given by the standalone tool?

The results yielded by the Traffic Estimator in your ad group and the standalone Traffic Estimator may differ for two reasons:
(1) Performance Data: The past performance of an ad group will influence the Quality Score of all the keywords in that ad group. Your ad group's Traffic Estimator considers the ad group's performance details when making estimates about your keywords. The standalone tool, on the other hand, does not. For the most accurate results, use the Traffic Estimator in your ad group.

(2) Double-Serving: In accordance with our double-serving policy, we will only show one of your ads on a search for a particular keyword, even if that keyword appears multiple times in your account. The Traffic Estimator in your ad group accounts for double serving among your keywords when making estimates, whereas the standalone tool does not. Therefore, the standalone tool may yield higher estimates when it evaluates a keyword that appears multiple times within your account.

Forum discussion at HighRankings Forums, Warrior Forums and several Google AdWords Help.

Daily Search Forum Recap: September 1, 2010

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

The Big Paid Search Merge Begins: Yahoo to Microsoft adCenter

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 3:28pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Marketing

So Yahoo web search, the organic results, are now powered by Bing, Microsoft search. The next to fall is the paid search side of things.

Yahoo announced yesterday that the beginning of the end for Panama, Yahoo's Search Marketing platform. It is the beginning end of Yahoo powering their own search ads on their own search interface.

Folks at Webmaster World are calling it a "merge." The big paid search merge? Well, not really, more like the "big dig" for Yahoo. Yahoo isn't necessarily merging their technology with Microsoft, they are telling their advertisers to get their campaigns set up in Microsoft adCenter because Yahoo is burying their software likely by the end of October (in the US and Canada).

Yahoo laid out the three stages to this transition:

There are three stages to completing your transition:

1) Prepare your account for transition to adCenter
When you log into your Yahoo! Search Marketing account, you’ll automatically be taken to a new tab labeled “adCenter.” We recommend that you review your Compatibility Report, and fix incompatibilities between your current Yahoo! campaigns and the adCenter platform before starting the transition to adCenter.

2) Transition your account to adCenter
When you begin your transition, you’ll be able to create a new adCenter account, or indicate that you have an existing adCenter account that you want to continue to use. If you choose, you can use the transition tool to copy your Yahoo! Search Marketing campaigns over to adCenter. Please note that your campaigns will retain the same status (active or paused) as they have within your Yahoo! account, so you may start incurring click charges for Bing traffic right away.

3) Continue to manage your Yahoo! Search Marketing account
The last stage in the transition process will occur when Yahoo! Search ad serving moves to adCenter, which we expect to begin in mid-October and be completed by the end of October. During this period, you should expect traffic from your Yahoo! Search Marketing account to decrease, and increase in your adCenter account. But until this process is complete, you’ll still need to actively manage your Yahoo! Search Marketing account to have your ads displayed on Yahoo! and our partner sites.

Forum discussion at Webmaster World.

Google Map In Web Search Can Drop Your CTR Up to 65%

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 3:17pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Google showing maps and local listings in the pure organic web search results is nothing new. For example, the image below shows a search for [plumber 10010], NYC plumbers. Now, if you are not in that local listing and you are in the web search results, what are the chances of you getting clicked on? Slim, no?

A WebmasterWorld thread is asking webmasters and SEOs to estimate the degradation of having the local listings mixed into the web search results. The estimates of the loss range anywhere from 10% to 65% depending on who you ask and where the map location is. I'd assume the example above would be closer to 65% but when the maps show up in the middle of the page, maybe closer to 20%?

Tedster of WebmasterWorld said, "I've seen more like 35% to 60% loss." The site references some studies done in the past as well.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Setting Google Geographic Target To "Unlisted"

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 3:06pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Honestly, this is one topic I really don't know too much about. Google lets your Geographic target for your web site in Google Webmaster Tools. But what if you have a ccTLD, a country specific top level domain such as .fr (France), and you want to not target a specific country?

The Google help document on this topic says:

You can only use this feature for sites with a generic top-level domain, such as .com or .org. Sites with country-coded top-level domains (such as .ie) are already associated with a geographic region, in this case Ireland.

I checked one site I have in my Webmaster Tools account, the only site with a ccTLD and it didn't let me specify a different country. So I assume only certain ccTLDs or TLDs can set "unlisted" as an option to target all countries? Or am I missing something?

Google said, "If you want to ensure that your site is not associated with any country or region, select Unlisted."

It does appear that only certain ccTLDs let you change the geographic target, like a .co TLD. And you can change it to unlisted in order to not set a geographic target.

There are a couple threads asking how long does it take once you set the "unlisted" marker. The threads are at WebmasterWorld and Google Webmaster Help.

The WebmasterWorld thread has Tedster saying:

I've only heard one practical report about this and the recovery took many months for them, but they say it did happen eventually.

I am not sure if anyone else has experience here, but I'd love to know how quickly Google picks up the geographic target change, specifically for using "unlisted" as an option.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and Google Webmaster Help.

Update: Google's JohnMu did point out a solid distinction between setting unlisted or not:

There's actually a subtle difference between not activating Webmaster Tools owner-specified geotargeting and selecting "Unlisted". Not selecting to do geotargeting through Webmaster Tools results in Google doing geotargeting automatically (generally based on the server location), activating geotargeting and selecting "Unlisted" in Webmaster Tools results in Google not doing geotargeting.

Google Cache Broken For Home Pages

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 2:43pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

There is a weird Google bug with the cache feature. It seems to only impact home pages. For example, a search for this site in Google returns a Google search result of the home page (we aren't penalized yet):

But when you click on the cache link, it takes you to a dead page:

This does not appear to impact inside pages, but rather only the root page (aka home page). Why?

I have been receiving emails reporting this, as well as spotted several threads in the forums about this. Threads come from Google Webmaster Help and WebmasterWorld.

I should note that this isn't uncommon and I wouldn't worry about this impacting your Google rankings.

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help and WebmasterWorld& HighRanking Forums.

Taking Over a Business With Bad Google Maps Reviews?

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 2:35pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

A Google Places Help thread has a story of a person who bought a business from someone else.

The issue is, that business has pretty bad reviews in Google Maps and since there will be new management, he wants to know how to remove the bad reviews.

A fair question, that is why you often see the "under new management" signs outside of businesses. People want to know when new businesses have new owners and thus maybe better customer service (or maybe not).

The business owner said:

I am buying a local small buisness in a few weeks. The current owner has some pretty nasty reviews about him that currently come up when people search the biz name. I want to know if there is a way to have those reviews removed once I take ownership - I don't want people avoiding me because of his past mistakes.

Andrew in the forums suggested he request that the current owner to delete his Google Places account. Then the reviews should go as well. He also suggests renaming the business, just because of the possible bad karma associated with the business.

Do you agree?

Forum discussion at Google Places Help.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 31, 2010

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

SEO Is Deeper Than What You Read

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 3:54pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Optimization

There is an outstanding thread by Tedster, Ted Ulle, at WebmasterWorld. The topic is on too many newbie SEOs taking the SEO advice given on forums, blogs, news sites and here at face value. He is concerned that a new SEO will read something and not understand the true meaning of what is really being said.

Let me quote a piece of his concern:

Recent years have seen a flood of interest in SEO. Unfortunately, a lot of recent entries into SEO have no sense of perspective and no idea of how to evaluate advice that they read or hear. And still they write blog articles ;( There's a lot of regurgitated second and third hand learning being spread today - and it's even being sold to clients.
SEO began in the 90s, back before the acronym itself was even created. Most of the pioneers were early affiliate marketers who personally reverse-engineered the search engine algorithms of the day. What they learned was privately shared, until it stopped working so well. At that point, the tidbits began to bleed into the wider pool of knowledge.

Why do I bring up this old time stuff? The same pattern still holds. And taking anyone's SEO advice at face value is a dangerous practice. Anyone who is not doing their own testing and measurement is at a disadvantage. They may be buying into advice that's outdated by many years - and some of it may even come from back in the 90s!

Truth be told, I am a culprit of spreading information that is not explained in detail each time I write it. Personally, I don't have patience, I don't have patience listening or reading something that needs to be explained in detail. I tend to get things quickly, at least I think I do, so listening to someone go on and on to make sure everyone is on the same page - well, it drives me nuts. So since that is my personality, I often don't have the patience to explain things that I already know. It isn't the best characteristic of myself, but we all have flaws, and this is one of mine.

Those who read this site every day, know this flaw in my writing and know how to read beyond what I write. If I make a comment that most people would likely break out into more detail and I don't, my reader knows why. I try my best to write concisely and get to the point without repeating myself, unlike what I am doing here. But sometimes without reviewing stuff and explaining it in detail, some new people to the industry that read my stuff won't get it fully and take it at face value.

I would say 50% of my posts, specifically when I offer SEO specific advice, don't go into enough detail for new SEOs to fully understand what to practice. That is a fault I have and you need to know that.

I have a recent example and I hope this person doesn't get upset with me using him as an example, but the content is out there in the public and thus complies with my blogging code of ethics.

Here is the tweets sent to me a few days ago:

.bbpBox22284877437 {background:url(http://a3.twimg.com/profile_background_images/126469275/2010-07-25_07-41-35_94.219.20.215.jpg) #333300;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

@rustybrick Hi, I got a questions, how does SocialMedia impact on Google-Ranking? Is there any impact?less than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone Oguzhan Kalkan
KalkanOguzhan

.bbpBox22285580295 {background:url(http://a3.twimg.com/profile_background_images/126469275/2010-07-25_07-41-35_94.219.20.215.jpg) #333300;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

@rustybrick not the same power like a Link, am I right?! just like that the bot recognisize that the site is popular for some relevant KeyW?less than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone Oguzhan Kalkan
KalkanOguzhan

Most experienced SEOs know that social media typically doesn't have a direct impact on your link building. It typically does not directly impact your Google rankings. What it does do it get people to become aware of your web site and the awareness may drive more links and the more links may drive better rankings in Google. So if I ever say that social media helps your Google rankings, that is what I may mean. I may skip over the details as to why and understanding why is important.

I am not the only SEO blogger who is guilty of taking this short cuts, so keep it in mind. And honestly, it is much worse in the forums. Then what you have is what Tedster described, new SEOs preaching half truths to other new SEOs and their clients and we got a problem. I apologize, but it is a bad habit I doubt will ever change. So please keep this in mind when reading what I write.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Google Adds Blog Filter To Help Find Blogs On Subjects

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 3:41pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Google announced they added a new filter that helps you find "specialized blogs" on any topic you can imagine.

Here is how it works. Go to Google, search for a topic, then click on the "blogs" filter on the left side (note: it might be hidden under a "more" link). Then when the page filters to blogs, click again on the left side, this time where it says "homepages." That filter will show the most important and relevant blogs on the search query you entered.

Here is a screen shot:

How is this useful? Well, for a searcher it is obvious, but what about an SEO? Finding blogs in a niche can sometimes be hard. Google has just made it so much easier. You can now find blogs in the aerospace engineering field or duck hunting field with ease. Form a relationship with those bloggers and garner links from them over time.

Tedster said in a forum thread, "This is pretty handy. I've already found a few sources I didn't know existed in various verticals I watch."

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Google Cost A Business $4 Million or Was It a Link Curator?

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 3:28pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Spam

Inc.com posted a really great article with a very catchy title. The title is a bit misleading, it reads How Google Cost Me $4 Million. In short, it goes through a story of how a site was doing great on Google, until Google penalized them and they rankings tanked, costing them a fortune of money.

The article ends very well:

We didn't see the kind of ratings we had before the penalty until Google's Caffeine update, this June. That was our final pardon. Now we're back at the top.
Without the Google penalty, we wouldn't be anywhere near as far along as we are. You have two choices: You can roll over and die, or you can grow beyond it.

But I love how Googler's respond to the title. Let me quote some Tweets:

.bbpBox22548554238 {background:url(http://s.twimg.com/a/1282866105/images/themes/theme10/bg.gif) #000000;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

I'm pretty sure I even know the specific SEO that caused [goo.gl] @gmtgiftbaskets are you going to name them? ;) #youveheardofthem less than a minute ago via web Matt Cutts
mattcutts

.bbpBox22554897762 {background:url(http://s.twimg.com/a/1282866105/images/themes/theme1/bg.png) #7668EB;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

This co. hired a Link Curator. Maybe link manipulators in the SEO trenches will reinvent themselves? [goo.gl]less than a minute ago via web Brian White
brianwhite

.bbpBox22547666024 {background:url(http://s.twimg.com/a/1282866105/images/themes/theme10/bg.gif) #000000;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

Reading [goo.gl] . Agree with the comment by JustinM @ [goo.gl] . Our guidelines are clear on this topic.less than a minute ago via web Matt Cutts
mattcutts

Clearly the company and Google know stuff we don't know. But in the end, this company received a nice amount of links and even asked Matt:

.bbpBox22560907248 {background:url(http://a1.twimg.com/profile_background_images/76347860/GGB_Twitter_BGround.jpg) #C0DEED;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

@mattcutts But you could link to us out of the kindness of your heart ;)less than a minute ago via TweetDeck Gourmet Gift Baskets
gmtgiftbaskets

I doubt you will see Matt link to them any time soon.

So who cost this gift basket company $4 million? Was it Google, a link builder or themselves?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 25, 2010

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

So Sad: Yahoo Finally & Officially Gave Up On Search

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:50pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Engine

I really don't know why I am so upset, but I am. Probably not as upset as all those Yahoo Search engineers who are out of a job or as upset as Jerry Yang but I am really upset.

Yahoo has been testing letting Bing power their search results then ramped it up last week. Then yesterday, officially flipped the switch in the U.S. and Canada. Yahoo no longer powers the underlying organic search results on Yahoo Search, it is now Bing who powers it.

Shashi Seth of Yahoo said, " I am proud to announce that the transition of organic search between Yahoo! and Microsoft is complete." Bing's Satya Nadella said, "Today I am happy to share that Bing is powering Yahoo!’s search results in the US and Canada." Yea, I am sure he is happy.

The paid results are next and that will likely be done in the next month or so, in my opinion. We are still waiting to hear on Site Explorer, BOSS, Search Monkey dates for transition or future plans.

I am sad. Yahoo was powering their own results. They dropped Google, bought several search companies (AllTheWeb, AltaVista Inktomi +) and launched their own Yahoo Search. That is done, no more, gone!

To make things worse, they are embarrassed that Bing is powering them. Why? point font at the bottom of the page? Heck, with Google, they had a fancy Google logo on the bottom or top of the results.

I am just sad!

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld, Digital Point Forums.

Update: So Yahoo responded to this blog post, without linking to it, saying they will always be a search engine. I tweeted it and got this response back from an SEO that I found to be dead on:

.bbpBox22093206978 {background:url(http://a1.twimg.com/profile_background_images/4877276/back5.jpg) #339933;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

@rustybrick Funny - when Yahoo uses someone else's data, they're evolving. When I do it, I'm a thin affiliate.less than a minute ago via TweetDeck Dr. Peter J. Meyers
dr_pete

Two more quotes, these from Danny Sullivan, who I am glad agrees with me:

.bbpBox22097768415 {background:url(http://a1.twimg.com/profile_background_images/1636162/flag-flickr.jpg) #9ae4e8;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

i'm among the "irresponsible" with "innuendo" that yahoo's not search engine. it's not. it offer search made by others [bit.ly]less than a minute ago via Seesmic twhirl Danny Sullivan
dannysullivan

.bbpBox22097866969 {background:url(http://a1.twimg.com/profile_background_images/1636162/flag-flickr.jpg) #9ae4e8;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

at least i'm not the one who said yahoo was never a search company. that was yahoo CEO carol bartz [selnd.com]less than a minute ago via Seesmic twhirl Danny Sullivan
dannysullivan

Setting The Preferred Domain In Google Webmaster Tools Won't Hurt You

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:44pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

A quick SEO myth buster post for you. You know how you can set the preferred domain in Google Webmaster Tools? Well, if you do that, you won't be deindexed, so don't worry.

A webmaster asked this question in a Google Webmaster Help thread and Google's JohnMu replied.

John said:

No, setting a preferred domain name does not result in a site being deindexed.

It is hard for Google to be more straightforward than that statement.

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

Study: META Descriptions Very Important Search Results Click Through Rates

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:29pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Dynamical.biz translated a new eye tracking study done Spanish (PDF here) of how searchers look at the search results on a search results page.

Here is the break down of the study, but before you look at it, let me define a "fixation" in terms of eye tracking studies. As per Wikipedia, a Fixation online eye tracking refers to the test subject fixing on a particular portion of the page. It is used to determine which areas of a web page receive the most views. This is used to adjust where content resides on a web page to maximize its exposure.

The one thing that really stands out to many SEOs is the META description, or the search engine snippet. In all types of queries, the meta description is fixated over more and more time is spent looking at it. More than the big blue hyper link and more than the URL.

Above is an explanation of the various parts of a typical search result. I would think the primary influencer for a click on a search result would be the title, not the snippet. But I guess people actually read those snippets, which can be pulled from your META description tag or dynamically curated by Google.

Much more on the study at Dynamical.biz.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

New Google Merchant Feed Error: "Duplicate Offers"

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:20pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

There is a new error message that has been officially introduced for Google Merchant Center merchants. The new error is known as "Duplicate offers" and shows up when Google thinks "there are duplicate items in your data feed that should be removed."

Google's Ronald from the Merchant Center team said in a Google Merchant Center Help thread:

As some of you may have already noticed, we've introduced a new error message called "Duplicate offers" in the data feed details page. This error message suggests that there are duplicate items in your data feed that should be removed. Please know that the Google Merchant Center program policies do not allow posting of duplicate items.

Some have indeed already noticed. You can just Google duplicate offers and restrict it to Google matches and you will see tons of complaints.

I assume Google has let the policy slide, but according to the policy:

Duplicate offers within the same account, or between separate accounts that you control, are not allowed.

Forum discussion at Google Merchant Center Help.

Google Cache Screwy?

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:14pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

A HighRanking Forums thread has many senior (old timer) SEOs complaining about the Google Cache. Let me quote one of my favorite online SEO personalities, "OldWelshGuy":

Something is really wrong with the Google cache reporting or caching system. OK of late (last 6 months or more) there are times when you check a cache and there is no cache (or reason not to be cached), but that has been rare. Now it is all over the place, with many sites reporting cache reporting having stopped mysteriously at August 12th or just before.
Oddly though the reality and the reporting is different. e.g.

One site on a site search is reporting 3 pages (there are 4) one of the pages was renamed and no redirect put in place, but it is not showing on a site: search. here is the thing though. go to the page, check the cache using the toolbar, and there it is showing as cached. I thought this was unique, but it isn't.

His complaints don't go unheard. Jill Whalen the owner of HighRankings replied saying, "Yep. It's pretty crazy. You can't believe much of anything you see at Google anymore."

Moderator, Qwerty said:

I've noticed lately that the "cached" link on the SERP for a site: search isn't working. When the link ought to point to webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:domain.com/page.htm, it's inserting a string of gobbledegook to create a URL like webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:hV2MVz1GswkJ:domain.com/page.htm, which goes to a page saying the search didn't match any documents. Pull the "hV2MVz1GswkJ:" out of the URL, and there's the cached copy of the page.

Some suspect it is caffeine related, while others are not sure.

Have you noticed these issues?

Forum discussion at HighRanking Forums.

Google Alerts Adds "Updates" Type Option

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:03pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Google Alerts has added an additional alert type to the bundle. The new type is named "updates" and likely gives you alerts when there are matches to Google's real time search index.

Here is a picture:

Google has been tweaking their Google Alerts system to make it more selective and more relevant recently. I wonder how adding "updates" to the mix might cause those relevancy tweaks to fall a bit, if at all?

I assume if you are subscribed to the "Everything" option, you will automatically start getting the new "updates" alerts.

Forum discussion at Google Blogoscoped Forums.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 24, 2010

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Some Clues On Making Unique Content From Google

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:53pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

I spotted an interesting thread at Google Webmaster Help where a manufacturer is upset that his vendors outrank him for his own products. The manufacturer provides an XML feed for their vendors and resellers to use and sell, but it is the same content the manufacturer uses on his own site.

He asked what he can do to make sure Google knows that his site is the source of this content and thus rank higher than his resellers? In that, Google's JohnMu replied offering a glimpse of insight into how to differentiate his content and make it unique enough for Google to find it rank worthy.

JohnMu spoke a bit about the Google algorithms, saying:

Our algorithms don't count characters, but they try to find unique content in a sense. I wouldn't worry too much about the length, I'd just make sure that you have pages about your software on your site that do not contain just the content that you're syndicating via the XML file. Adding a sentence or two is one way to do this, even better would be to make it completely unique. Keep in mind that the unique content is not only for Googlebot -- your visitors will want to see it too. As the developer of your software, I'd assume that you would know it much better than the other sites, so as a user, I would expect to find more and more detailed information on your site. I bet that's already the case, so perhaps you're already all set :).

Key take-aways?

Character count not important
Unique "sense" is important
Two unique sentences may do the trick
Use content your not sending to resellers

None of this is crazy, but we do see Google saying things that they may not have said in the past. Such as the length of the content is not important, a sentence or two may be enough to make it unique enough and something about "unique sense."

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

GoogleBot Crawling From Different Locations At Same Time

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:47pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

The obsessed SEOs at WebmasterWorld have noticed that for the first time in watching how GoogleBot (Google's search crawler) spiders their sites, they are now crawling from a few different IP addresses at the same time.

Long time WebmasterWorld members said this is the first time they have seen GoogleBot crawl their site at the same time from multiple IPs. Several have noticed GoogleBots crawling from three different IPs at the same time. One member said:

We had lots of crawler activity today on a newer site, google hit the site from 3 different ip addresses throughout the day. Hoping it's a good sign, never seen them use different ip addresses in the same day before.

Another senior member added:

Yea they went berzerk on our big site last thursday and friday. their fast activity notified me so I took a peek to see who was scraping the site... I've never seen Google spider so fast and from so many IP addresses, they were all valid Google ip's but there was like 10-20 of them running at once.

Have you noticed this behavior?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Reporting Search Spam To Bing

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:37pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Microsoft MSN Search

Now that Bing owns about 30% of the U.S. market share by gobbling up Yahoo's search share, some people may want to know how to report search spam to Bing.

Now, we know most SEOs won't report competitors to spam. The topic of spam reporting is nothing new:

That being said, if you wanted to report serious spam that you are afraid your children or grandparents would be hurt by, then here is how.

Go to Bing.com and on the bottom right, there is a link for "Tell us what you think." Click it and select "Found Spam" in the drop down on the form. Fill it out and pray they do something.

The "Tell us what you think" is found on all the search result pages as well, so it is always in the bottom right hand corner of all the pages.

You can also try this form or the Bing Webmaster Forums.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums & Bing Forums.

Google AdWords Issues: Invalid Clicks Bug, Billing Tab Inaccessible & Snapshot Date Off

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:26pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdWords

There are several new known issues with the Google AdWords system. The issues are being worked on by Google and you should know that they will be taking care of them.

(1) Invalid Clicks & Invalid Click Rate Wrong:

Due to a technical issue, the Invalid Clicks column and the Invalid Click rate column from the campaigns management tab are showing 0 for all the campaigns in your account. Our engineers are working on resolving this issue.

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.

(2) Billing Tab Is Inaccessible For Some:

Some customers might not be able to access the Billing tabs in their Adwords account. A workaround is to go directly to the pages once you have logged in to your AdWords account, and go to the 'Billing Summary or the 'Billing Preferences.'

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.

(3) Wrong Message On Account Snapshot:

There is a message on the account snapshot page about a system maintenance showing the incorrect dates. The system maintenance will take place from August 21, 2010 10:00 AM through August 21, 2010 2:00 PM Pacific Time. Please disregard the dates that are posted for 2005 and 2015, apologies for the inconvenience.

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.

Google Places Image Upload Broken?

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:17pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

There are several users recently reporting that they are unable to upload photos to their business listing in Google Places. The reports come via the Google Places Help forum and there are dozens of complaints in the past week.

The first recent complaint said:

Image uploads are broken. I have tried valid JPG images both from the web and my computer and they all show up as broken links.

Then we have several, "me too" posts, such as:

I am having the same problem. I have tried uploading photos from my computer as well as from my flickr stream and they all show up as broken links.

The thing is, I personally just tried it and it worked fine. No errors:

Maybe all these users are uploading them wrong? There are specific format requirements for photos, but can this many people not be following those requirements? Maybe it is a browser specific issue?

Forum discussion at Google Places Help.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 23, 2010

Posted: August 23rd, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Why Are My Search Query Counts in Google Webmaster Tools The Same?

Posted: August 23rd, 2010, 3:57pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

If you ever login to see your Google Webmaster Tools search query reports you may notice that from day to day, the chart may display the same number of queries.

One person questioned this in Google Webmaster Help asking how this is possible. This webmaster didn't believe his eyes and asked, "How come that the queries can be the same 4 days in a row?"

Here is a screen shot from my report and I see similar patterns:

Google's JohnMu confirmed this reality in the Google Webmaster Help thread and said it was due to how the numbers were "bucketed" in their system. John said:

This is due to the way that the numbers are "bucketed" in our system. Basically, to simplify the UI a bit, ca. the values 160 to 260 may get reduced to 210 and shown that way in the user interface. In practice, if the numbers are the same for you, this means that it has been relatively stable for that time. We're looking into ways of making this a bit clearer or providing more exact numbers, but in the meantime if you see this, I wouldn't worry about it :).

Just another one of those deeper interesting tidbits gleamed from tough questions answered by Google.

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 20, 2010

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Video Recap of Weekly Search Buzz :: August 20, 2010

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 8:50pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Buzz RoundUp

This week I covered two interesting Google anomalies. The first is where brand type queries are showing mostly results from that brand's domain. The second is Google is showing only Google pages for some search results. The big news this week is that Bing is now powering Yahoo fully in the U.S. and Canada. With that, Site Explorer, BOSS and Search Monkey are changing. Google added a new way to verify you site in Google Webmaster Tools. comScore released their search market share report. Bing News can drive nice traffic, that is if you can get included. Facebook does place check-ins, like Foursquare. We had lots of logos to share with you this week. Finally, SES San Francisco was this week, which is why I act so tired in the video. That was this past week at the Search Engine Roundtable.

Make sure to subscribe to our video feed or subscribe directly on iTunes to be notified of these updates and download the video in the background. You can also watch this live and ask questions during the show, typically Friday mornings around 9:30 (EST) at seroundtable.com/live, follow @rustybrick to be notified when we air. Here is the YouTube version of the feed:

For the original iTunes version, click here.

Search Topics of Discussion:

Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!

SEOs & Webmasters Complaining About Google's Canonical Tag?

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 3:24pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

About a year and a half ago, Google released the canonical tag. In summary, it is basically a special snippet of code you place on your page that does a 301 redirect without physically redirecting people, instead it redirects search bots.

In December, they expanded the use of this tag to support cross-domain canonical tag usage, as opposed to just using the tag internally. Personally, I have just used the canonical tag internally, never applied it cross-domain - yet.

A WebmasterWorld thread has Tedster saying that many, too many, webmasters are complaining about issues with the tag. He said, "in the past week or so I've read several accounts around the web of so-called "canonical disasters." He adds:

I've used the canonical link tag with no apparent problems, and in some cases it put an easy band-aid on a nasty infrastructure knot. But now I'm reading some SEO blogs that warn against serving the canonical link on the "original" URL. How could that be a problem?

I agree on that I don't see why SEOs or Webmasters would have issues with it. But I don't agree in seeing more complaints about it than normal.

In fact, in March I ran a poll asking does the canonical tag work well on Google? The response break down was mostly positive:

Not all positive. I kind of thing webmasters may not be using it right? Or maybe I am wrong?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Does Google AdSense Automatically Show Your Best Color Ad?

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 3:13pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdSense

A WebmasterWorld thread has Google AdSense publishers wondering if Google automatically shows the best performing ad color.

As you know, you can allow Google to rotate the AdSense color templates for you. But is that purely random or is Google showing your best color?

Most publishers suspect Google automatically shows the best performing colors. Netmeg said:

I always just assumed they rotated them. It's a good question.

The help document on this say sit is completely random. I'll quote it:

You can select up to 4 palettes that will rotate randomly.

Would be nice if Google did the best performing color more often?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Google Lets You Verify Your Site in Webmaster Tools With Google Analytics Code

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 3:03pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Google announced adding an additional method of verifying your site with Google Webmaster Tools. In addition to the HTML file, META tag inclusion, and DNS method of verification, you can now use Google Analytics code.

This specifically works with the new asynchronous Analytics JavaScript code but everyone should use that code anyway.

The process is simple. Set up the special code on the site, then go to Webmaster Tools and verify the site. You must be the administrator on the Google Analytics account associated with the JavaScript snippet for you to continue to see that site in your Google Webmaster Tools section.

Here is a screen capture of the current available methods of verification:

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

Bing News Sends Nice Traffic & Can Be Delayed

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 2:55pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Microsoft MSN Search

When it comes to news search engines, it seems like all we talk about is Google News and rarely Yahoo or Bing News.

I spotted a WebmasterWorld thread with a rare post by someone included in the Bing News index. The publisher said, "My site has just been indexed in Bing News. And I like it."

He said he didn't request to get listed in Bing News, which, by the way, doesn't work. He was just included randomly and he loves what he sees.

He noticed an "uptick in retweets" and looked into it. It turned out to be Bing sending traffic to his site via Bing News.

Yes, Bing is way more selective than Google News. He also said that some of his content gets pulled into Bing News on a two-day delay. I am not sure if that is specific to his site being newly indexed or just the way Bing handles "news," which kind of doesn't make sense.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

SES San Francisco 2010 Coverage Recap

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 2:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Search Engine Strategies San Francisco is now over and I wanted to recap the sessions we covered over the past three days.

But first, I wanted to thank our live blog volunteers. Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer, Ben Pfeiffer & Shanon Woodruff of RankSmart did an outstanding job covering the sessions. I hope you enjoyed the coverage and I wanted to give a big thank you to them.

We covered about 35 sessions and here they are:

Day One:

Day Two:

Day Three:

Thanks all!

SES SFO: Advanced Paid Search Tactics

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 2:30am CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Advanced Paid Search Tactics from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Advanced Paid Search Tactics

SES SFO: Killer Facebook Marketing: Do's and Don'ts

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 1:00am CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Killer Facebook Marketing: Do's and Don'ts from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Ben Pfeiffer of RankSmart & Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Killer Facebook Marketing: Do's and Don'ts

SES SFO: Ads in a Quality Score World

Posted: August 19th, 2010, 11:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Ads in a Quality Score World from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Ads in a Quality Score World

SES SFO: Social & the Marketing Mix

Posted: August 19th, 2010, 11:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Social & the Marketing Mix from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Shanon Woodruff of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Social & the Marketing Mix

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 19, 2010

Posted: August 19th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

SES SFO: Search Marketing Toolbox

Posted: August 19th, 2010, 10:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Search Marketing Toolbox from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Search Marketing Toolbox

SES SFO: Duplicate Content & Multiple Site Issues

Posted: August 19th, 2010, 10:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Duplicate Content & Multiple Site Issues from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Ben Pfeiffer of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Duplicate Content & Multiple Site Issues

SES SFO: Social Media 101

Posted: August 19th, 2010, 10:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Social Media 101 from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Shanon Woodruff of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Social Media 101

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 18, 2010

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

SES SFO: Search, PR & the Social Butterfly

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 10:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Search, PR & the Social Butterfly from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Shanon Woodruff of RankSmart, Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer & Ben Pfeiffer of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Search, PR & the Social Butterfly

SES SFO: It's All About the User: Search Insights for Your Site

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 10:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the It's All About the User: Search Insights for Your Site from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Barry Schwartz of RustyBrick.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

It's All About the User: Search Insights for Your Site

SES SFO: Crossing the Digital Divide: The Leap From Search to Display

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 8:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Crossing the Digital Divide: The Leap From Search to Display from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Crossing the Digital Divide: The Leap From Search to Display

SES SFO: Bringing SEO In-House: The Pros and Cons

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 8:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Bringing SEO In-House: The Pros and Cons from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Ben Pfeiffer of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Bringing SEO In-House: The Pros and Cons

SES SFO: News Search Optimization

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 8:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the News Search Optimization from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Shanon Woodruff of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

News Search Optimization

SES SFO: Keynote - BJ Fogg Author, Persuasive Technology

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 7:15pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Keynote - BJ Fogg Author, Persuasive Technology from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer & Barry Schwartz of RustyBrick.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Keynote - BJ Fogg Author, Persuasive Technology

Yahoo Site Explorer Migrating Into Bing Webmaster Tools & More

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 4:44pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Optimization

As you know by now, Yahoo promised to complete the transition to being fully powered by Bing in the U.S. and Canada within a week of time. But what does that mean for the beloved Yahoo Site Explorer or BOSS or Search Monkey?

Site Explorer will stick around until all of the migration is complete. But when the Bing transition in the U.S. and Canada are complete, within a week or so, Yahoo hopes to announce when Bing will have the Site Explorer features in Bing Webmaster Tools.

When Bing released their new Bing Webmaster Center it was missing a critical feature, linkage data. Many speculated that Yahoo Site Explorer would replace it and that is kind of true. Bing Webmaster Center will get linkage tools via Site Explorers framework, some how. We should know exactly when that will happen in a week or so.

BOSS is sticking around too, but there will be some ways to monetize that so it makes sense for Yahoo to keep it around. I believe Bing will power some of Yahoo BOSS and Yahoo will power parts of it as well. But there are not many details exactly what will happen with BOSS going forward at this point.

SearchMonkey is kind of dead. The developer tools are going away but they markup techniques will remain on Yahoo Search. Bing may or may not use some of the markup techniques, but Yahoo will continue to use it to make the search results richer there.

You can learn a lot more about the specifics at the Yahoo Developer blog and on the Yahoo Search blog.

Forum discussion at Webmaster World.

Bing To Power Yahoo Within The Week

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 4:29pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Engine

Yahoo announced that Bing will be powering Yahoo Search on the organic side later this week. Right now and for the past month, Yahoo has been testing Bing powered search results on Yahoo. Yahoo said, the full transition is happening later this week and they will let us know when it is complete.

You will also know the transition is complete when you see the "Powered by Bing" logo on the bottom of the Yahoo Search results.

This is only for the United States and Canada Yahoo Search results, the other results won't change over until 2012. This is also only for the organic side of things.

Also, you should know the organic results between Yahoo and Bing, the ranking order, will be exactly the same when this transition is complete. Yahoo may add some makeup to the results, but the ranking order will be exactly the same.

On the paid side, Yahoo is testing the account migration tool now and hopes to release it to everyone in the upcoming weeks.

I'll follow up this post on the webmaster side of the things. Specifically, Yahoo Site Explorer, BOSS and SearchMonkey.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

What If You Link To A Site Banned In Google?

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 4:22pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

A WebmasterWorld thread has one webmaster who is a bit nervous after finding out a site he links to is banned in Google. He said it is a popular site, the site was banned approximately 3-months ago and he is linking to it. He asked, should he be worried about his rankings being downgraded for linking to a banned site?

In his case, it has only been a few months and I doubt Google would penalize him for one link to a recently banned site, if that link was there prior. Before I get into my thoughts, take my poll, do you think linking to banned sites can hurt you?

Would Linking To A Banned Site Hurt You?Market Research

Overall, Google knows you have control over who you link to. If you don't, you can always enforce a nofollow attribute on links from third-parties on your web site. If you do not do that, it is your fault. If you link out to sites that are spam or banned, then maybe, if there are enough of them, Google would consider your site to be untrustworthy and you might see a degration in your rankings.

I don't think one link will make that much of a difference, but many - yea.

Do you agree?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

comScore July 2010 Search Ranking Share Report

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 4:13pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Industry News

comScore released their July 2010 search market share report, showing Yahoo climbing to 17% share, Google still around 65% and Bing at 11%. Here is the chart, using their new explicit search measuring technique.

The folks at WebmasterWorld, at least these days, are very pro Bing and anti-Google. So they are happy to see Google take a slight drop and Yahoo increase.

well I tell everyone to use Bing as SE if they dont want one looking over your shoulder all the time

In any event, Google still dominates.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Do Keyword Rich Domain Names Have a Search Ranking Edge?

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 4:01pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Optimization

We have been writing about keywords in the domain name for ages now. In fact, Matt Cutts said keywords in URLs do help on some level. A poll we held a while back had 75% of SEOs feel Google loves keywords in the URL.

But in 2010, is Google still in love with keyword rich domains?

A WebmasterWorldthread has some people saying yes and others saying it depends. One said, "It seems to me, SEO-wise, generic keyword laden domains are still the way to go. That may change in the future, but it hasn't yet."

But is that true with competitive keywords? Tedster replied:

My guess would be that, as a percentage, it's not really as high as our impression says. If you've ever tried to rank a keyword-match domain in a competitive market, you know it takes more than just the domain.

There is a lot more than a keyword in a URL or a bunch of links that makes up Google's ranking algorithm. Of course, everything might help here and there and if you have a keyword rich domain name, people may use plain anchor text of your domain name to link to you. But keeping things constant, how valuable is the keyword in the domain as a stand alone factor? It is hard for you and I to say.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

SES SFO: Introduction to Remarketing

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 2:00am CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Introduction to Remarketing from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer & Ben Pfeiffer of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Introduction to Remarketing

SES SFO: Developing Great Content

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 2:00am CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Developing Great Content from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Shanon Woodruff of RankSmart.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Developing Great Content

SES SFO: Deep Dive Into Analytics

Posted: August 18th, 2010, 12:45am CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Below is live coverage of the Deep Dive Into Analytics from the SES SFO conference.

This coverage is provided by Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer.

We are using a live blogging tool to provide the real time coverage, please excuse any typos. You can also interact with us and while we are live blogging, so feel free to ask us questions as we blog. We will publish the archive below after the session is completed.

Deep Dive Into Analytics

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 11, 2010

Posted: August 11th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Announcing SphinnCon Israel 2011 - January 9, 2011

Posted: August 11th, 2010, 3:49pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Conferences

I am so excited to announce that we are bringing SMX SphinnCon Israel back for a 3rd year to Jerusalem, Israel. This year, the event will take place on Sunday, January 9, 2011. We are hosting the event at a Inbal Hotel, a really nice hotel in Jerusalem, place I have personally stayed several times and highly recommend.

Having it at the Inbal let's us fit over twice as many people. But I strongly recommend you register early, because each time we announce the event, it is sold out within 1.5 months. So please, I beg you, register now, this way you guarantee your seat at the SphinnCon event.

We are currently offering an early bird discount of $75 per ticket. To qualify for that discount, again, you should register now. The $75 will be available up until we announce the sessions and the full agenda. After that, the price will go up.

Attending SphinnCon Israel will give you a full day event, unlike in the past where it was only a half a day. In addition, it will include refreshments throughout the day and a full service lunch, catered by the Inbal hotel. We will have the best speakers in the SEO, PPC, SEM, Social Media space presenting and networking at the event. We will deliver the best SEM related networking in the region. Plus, it will be a lot of fun - so please register early.

We currently have Answers.com as an early sponsor for the event. The Inbal Hotel will be our Wifi sponsor. I am looking for additional sponsors, if you are interested, please email sphinncon@rustybrick.com and I can send you details. The sponsorship packages are very inexpensive and will return a really nice ROI for your business. Outside of that, if any Israel-based SEO, SEM, Analytics, Social Media company wants to help support this extremely important event, please do contact us.

Want to speak? We are working on the agenda now, so feel free to find out how to speak at searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon.

I wanted to thank my posse for helping me organize this event every year. They include Ophir Cohen, CEO, Compucall Web Marketing, Branko Rihtman, SEO & R&D Specialist at WhiteWeb, Gilad Sasson, Director of Search & Online Marketing at Nekuda, Eli Feldblum, Founder & CTO at RankAbove, Mayer Reich of RankAbove and many others. So thank you all!

I urge you to register as soon as possible before all the seats are taken. Register at searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon by clicking on the "Ready to Register? CLICK HERE" icon at the top right. You will be taken to rustybrick.com/sphinncon and asked to register and pay over there.

Don't miss out, register today at searchmarketingexpo.com/sphinncon.

Event Quick Details:
Date: Sunday, January 9, 2011
Time: 8:00am to 5:30pm
Venue: Inbal Hotel
Location: Liberty Bell Park 3 Jabotinsky Street, Jerusalem 92145
Cost: $75 early bird special
Max Attendance: ~500 people

Google Can't Find The Original Source Of Content?

Posted: August 11th, 2010, 3:39pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Since the MayDay update there have been a spike in complaints about site's with stolen content outranking the sites they stole the content from.

This is an old issue, which Google was typically not too bad at handling. You have 5 web sites, one web site wrote the content first, then the other four snatched the content from the original source. Google was typically good at knowing who was the original source and ranking that original source higher, independent of which site had more PageRank and authority.

Since MayDay, it appears that original source detection has gone a bit haywire.

There is a large WebmasterWorldthread and a new DigitalPoint Forums thread with constant complaints about Google ranking scraper sites above the original source.

Is it Caffeine or MayDay related? Is it that Caffeine is discovering content faster on the scraper site, thus giving them the original source credit (if it works that way)? Or is it a ranking algorithm change with MayDay, finding original source credit less valuable then other criteria?

Tedster's theory:

It comes from Mayday giving good rankings to "sites" they feel are more popular - and therefore better over all destinations for the search user. The emphasis used to be more on the "page" rather than the "site".

Have you found this to be a larger issue since MayDay/Caffeine?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorldthread and a new DigitalPoint Forums.

Google SSL Search Not Working In Safari 5

Posted: August 11th, 2010, 3:34pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Here is an interesting bug that I was able to replicate. Google SSL search and reportedly Google.com search yesterday, was/is not working on Apple's Safari 5 web browser.

We have some complaints about it at Google Web Search Help:

So I am running Safari 5 on my MacBook Pro and just recently when I type something into the Google search bar and hit enter, the Google search bar page reloads with no results. I type the same thing into the search bar and hit enter...and then it finds some results for me. This is quite annoying to have to type in what I am searching for twice in order to do a search. If this bug is not fixed I will be switching to another search engine. I hope that I do not have to do that.

Googler Sarah H. chimed in and said:

Thanks for reporting this bug and for providing the details.
As we look into it will you please reply back with the URL you get after the unsuccessful search but before the successful second attempt? That will be helpful because I am not able to reproduce what you're experiencing.

I was personally able to replicate the issue using Google SSL search in Safari 5. Here is a screen cast of that:

Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 10, 2010

Posted: August 10th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

SES San Francisco 2010 Live Blog Coverage Schedule

Posted: August 10th, 2010, 9:41pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San

Search Engine Strategies San Francisco 2010, the first SES SFO (formerly known as SES San Jose), is next week. We will be providing live blog coverage of the event on Tuesday, August 17th through Thursday August 19th.

Not only is SES at a new location, it seems like the logo and branding may have changed as well. The new logo is on the top right of this post.

Old Logo:

Live blogging SES San Francisco are veterans Keri Morgret of MyNextCustomer, Ben Pfeiffer & Shanon Woodruff of RankSmart and myself. I wanted to thank the volunteers before the conference, they will be helping out hundreds of SEOs who can't attend.

Here is out SES San Francisco 2010 Live Coverage Schedule:

Tuesday, August 17 - Day 1
9:30-10:45am
Opening Keynote - Jeffrey Hayzlett, Celebrity CMO Former Kodak CMO covered by Barry Schwartz
11:30-12:30pm
How Large Advertisers are Accelerating their SEO with Social Media covered by Shanon Woodruff & Keri Morgret
Search: Where to Next? covered by Ben Pfeiffer
1:30-2:30pm
Digital Asset Optimization covered by Barry Schwartz
Meaningful SEO Metrics: Going Beyond the Numbers covered by Keri Morgret & Ben Pfeiffer
Introduction to Information Retrieval on the Web covered by Shanon Woodruff
3:00-4:00pm
Link Building Basics covered by Ben Pfeiffer
Content Marketing Optimization covered by Shanon Woodruff & Barry Schwartz
Deep Dive Into Analytics covered by Keri Morgret
4:15-5:15pm
Developing Great Content covered by Shanon Woodruff
Introduction to Remarketing covered by Ben Pfeiffer & Keri Morgret

Wednesday, August 18 - Day 2
9:30-10:30am
Keynote - BJ Fogg Author, Persuasive Technology covered by Keri Morgret & Barry Schwartz
11:00-12:00pm
News Search Optimization covered by Shanon Woodruff
Bringing SEO In-House: The Pros and Cons covered by Ben Pfeiffer
Crossing the Digital Divide: The Leap From Search to Display covered by Keri Morgret
1:00-2:00pm
It's All About the User: Search Insights for Your Site covered by Barry Schwartz
Search, PR & the Social Butterfly covered by Shanon Woodruff, Ben Pfeiffer& Keri Morgret
2:30-3:30pm
Real-Time Storytelling covered by Shanon Woodruff
Link Building in August of 2010 with Jim Boykin covered by Ben Pfeiffer
Competitive Research covered by Keri Morgret
3:45-4:45pm
Ad Innovations @ SES SF covered by Ben Pfeiffer
B2B Search Marketing Tips covered by Keri Morgret
Twitternation & Automation covered by Shanon Woodruff & Barry Schwartz
5:00-6:00pm
How to Become a Link Magnet covered by Ben Pfeiffer & Barry Schwartz
Beyond the Click: What Shoppers Need Now covered by Shanon Woodruff

Thursday, August 19 - Day 3
9:30-10:30am
Keynote - Tim Ash, Author, CEO, SiteTuners.com covered by Keri Morgret & Barry Schwartz
10:45-11:45am
PPC or SEO? The Ultimate Search Marketing Battle covered by Shanon Woodruff & Ben Pfeiffer
Enterprise Level SEO covered by Barry Schwartz
12:00-1:00pm
Social Media 101 covered by Shanon Woodruff
Duplicate Content & Multiple Site Issues covered by Ben Pfeiffer
Search Marketing Toolbox covered by Keri Morgret
2:00-3:00pm
Social & the Marketing Mix covered by Shanon Woodruff
Ads in a Quality Score World covered by Keri Morgret
3:15-4:15pm
Killer Facebook Marketing: Do's and Don'ts covered by Ben Pfeiffer & Keri Morgret
4:45-5:45pm
Advanced Paid Search Tactics covered by Keri Morgret

That is our live blogging schedule - it is subject to change last minute.

Google Updates AdSense Layouts

Posted: August 10th, 2010, 3:30pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdSense

It has been a while since we have seen an update to the Google AdSense unit layouts. But today that has changed, Google announced new layouts are coming to the leaderboard, medium and large rectangles units. Here is a picture of the change:

The changes include:

Leaderboard (728x90): the title, description, and URL are now arranged in rows instead of columns (except in the case when only one ad is showing)
Medium and large rectangles (300x250, 336x280): the URL is now in the same line as the title
Font size changes on some units

Did you notice any changes on your sites? Good or bad?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Google Images Redesign Doubles Schools Bandwidth Bill

Posted: August 10th, 2010, 3:23pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

A few weeks ago, Google launched a redesigned Google Images that lets searchers discover more images faster. There were complaints from Webmasters and some from searchers who don't like change.

Today, I spotted a very interesting complaint via Google Web Search Help. The complaint comes from a school in New Zealand with 1,200 students. Their Google Image Search data usage has more than doubled their weekly bandwidth fees.

The school administrator said, a typical week of bandwidth consumption at the school is about 17GB. Since the Google Image Search redesign, their bandwidth consumption has been 39GB! That is a 130% increase in bandwidth usage and that increases cause and responsiveness of the rest of the network.

Interesting complaint, don't you think?

Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.

Police Raid Google South Korea Over Wireless Data Collection

Posted: August 10th, 2010, 3:15pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Remember how Google got themselves in trouble over storing data collected via those Street View cars?

Well, there are reports via places like the New York Times and BBC that South Korean police raided Google and took files, hard drives and documents.

The police say, "we will investigate Google Korea officials and scrutinize the data we confiscated today." We intend to find out what kinds of data they have collected and how much. We will try to retrieve all the original data illegally collected and stored through domestic Wi-Fi networks from the Google headquarters."

Forum discussion at Google Blogoscoped Forums.

Why Google Reader May Be Slow

Posted: August 10th, 2010, 3:08pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Roger from the Google Reader team has been replying to people about why Google Reader may take several hours to show updates from their blogs or web sites.

A Google Reader Help thread shows Roger giving two excuses for a slow Google Reader update. They include:

(1) A site with "few subscribers."

(2) A site using Google's FeedBurner.

The "few subscribers" excuse means that Google rather spend their resources crawling larger subscribed feeds more often than feeds with fewer subscribers. That makes a 100% sense. But site's that use Google's FeedBurner, a feed management tool, owned by Google, which so many sites use, would slow down Google Reader? Technically it makes sense, but practically, it sounds silly.

Let me quote Roger:

Sometimes Reader doesn't crawl blogs with few subscribers right away - if you only have a few subscribers, this could be the case. If you have more subscribers, are you by chance using Feedburner? Sometimes Feedburner doesn't update with your original feed's content right away, and thus Reader cannot detect new content until it is updated in Feedburner.

Most sites I subscribe to are visibile in Google Reader within minutes. Some takes a couple hours, but most are within minutes - including this one.

Forum discussion at Google Reader Help.

Searching For Apples? Good Luck!

Posted: August 10th, 2010, 3:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

A WebmasterWorld thread has issues with a search in Google for [apples]. The searcher uses this as an example to say that Google's search results are simply "horrible" and "getting worse."

What do you expect when you search for [apples]? Do you expect Apple computers or Apple the fruit? Here is his marked up screen shot that make the Google results even look worse:

Now, if you compare that to Bing's [apples], you get very different results. Apple computers is only one result and in the middle of the page. Yahoo isn't great but that will change.

Clearly this is one example of many searches. Tedster said:

That's an example of the Google "intention engine" misfiring. It's ignoring the "s" for 8/10 results, and that's not very smart at all.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 9, 2010

Posted: August 9th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Google Adds Video Sitemaps Errors To Google Webmaster Tools

Posted: August 9th, 2010, 3:54pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Google has been explaining to us recently that videos and video sitemaps will be something they are focusing a lot of effort on over the rest of this year. Matt Cutts has recommended SEOs focus a bit more on their video sitemaps efforts because of this change.

Over the weekend, Google has added a "Video Sitemaps" section under Google Webmaster Tools's "Lab" section. When you access it, it tells you:

Video Sitemaps Errors. We are constantly updating our data, so please keep checking back with us to make sure your sitemaps are healthy.

Currently, for all my Sitemap feeds in this report, I see "No information found." I honestly do not see how this differs from the "Sitemaps" under "Site configuration," where you can learn more about your Sitemaps errors there. But Google has added a special Video Sitemaps page to the Labs section for a reason.

What can we take away from this?

(1) Video Sitemaps are becoming more and more important.
(2) Something different will be shown here, compared to the Sitemaps section under Site configuration.

Here is a picture of what I have:

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld& DigitalPoint Forums.

Are Link Exchange Emails Dead?

Posted: August 9th, 2010, 3:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Link Building

The top of asking for links, is nothing new. We wrote about link exchanges dozens of times here, heck we know that Tuesday mornings is the best time to send them out to convince people to link to you.

But in 2010, are link exchanges emails still worth it? When you get a link exchange request, do you delete the email without looking? Do you bother reading link exchange emails? Do you bother replying? Do you send them out yourself?

Take our poll:

Do You Respond To Link Exchange Emails?survey software

A WebmasterWorld thread is having a debate on this topic now. Moderator, martinibuster, said:

Virtually ever link request I have received for at least the last six years has been useless trash. If I put a rule on my inbox to permanently delete any email with typical link request subject lines, I am confident I will not miss reading them.
Is it possible that we have reached the end of blind reciprocal link requests and it's time the industry stopped sending them?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

SEO Industry Buzzes On Demand Media's IPO

Posted: August 9th, 2010, 3:33pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Industry News

The SEO industry is buzzing on the recent news that Demand Media has filed an IPO. Demand Media owns and runs online properties such as eHow, Trails.com, LiveStrong.com, GolfLink, AnswerBag, Cracked and more. They are significant in that their whole content business is around ranking well in the search results, primarily Google and primarily organically.

Danny Sullivan has the best write up on what this all means. Here are his takeaways, but read the whole analysis for why:

Google Funds Big Chunk Of Demand Media
The Importance (And Risk) Of SEO
Search Sends Nearly 40% Of Traffic; Google Alone, 26% Or More
Traffic Is Vulnerable To Algorithm Changes
Mining Search Data, they mine the data to produce content
They do domaining

A WebmasterWorld thread is discussing the news. Brett Tabke, the founder of WebmasterWorld, thinks these guys are genius SEOs:

What Rosenblatt and the crew have done is nothing short of genius in the SEO space. To qualify algorithmically and engineer daily content is freaking brilliant. To get it to rank and convert in the long tail is even bigger. No wonder everyone is so jealous of their success. They are the top SEO’s on the web. They are without a peer.

Another member asked, "I wonder if the recent google patent influenced the decision to IPO, or if they had already planned to?"

I doubt it.

In any event, this is one of those events that is somewhat historical for our industry.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Google Custom Search Engine Layout Chrome Bug

Posted: August 9th, 2010, 3:29pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

A confirmed bug with the Google Custom Search Engine is being discussed at the Google Custom Search Help forum.

The bug appears when doing a search for a set promotion using a Google Custom Search Engine interface. What happens is the search results appear halfway down the page below the advertisements on the right.

This only occurs in Google Chrome, Google's browser.

Google said they are aware of the issue and they are working on a fix. Googler Prathap Reddy said:

We are aware of the issue. We are working on identifying a fix for this issue.

Forum discussion at Google Custom Search Help.

Video Recap of Weekly Search Buzz :: August 6, 2010

Posted: August 6th, 2010, 11:05pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Buzz RoundUp

This week I did the month webmaster review of Google. Google's Peter Norvig explained how not necessarily the most relevant. Google admits that links can hurt you. Google using May Day as an excuse for poor rankings. Google to allow bidding and using trademarked keywords in the UK, Canada and Ireland. Google allows business owners to reply to Google Maps reviews. Google Places submissions with "Google" in the submission will be put on hold. Bing revamped their Maps product and made Bing Shopping free for merchants. Do 301 redirected links pass less PageRank today then before the May Day or Caffeine updates? Finally, a farewell to a legend in search, Yahoo's Tim Mayer leaves Yahoo. That was this past week at the Search Engine Roundtable.

Make sure to subscribe to our video feed or subscribe directly on iTunes to be notified of these updates and download the video in the background. You can also watch this live and ask questions during the show, typically Friday mornings around 9:30 (EST) at seroundtable.com/live, follow @rustybrick to be notified when we air. Here is the YouTube version of the feed:

For the original iTunes version, click here.

Search Topics of Discussion:

Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 6, 2010

Posted: August 6th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Since MayDay/Caffeine is PageRank Being Diluted More When 301 Redirected?

Posted: August 6th, 2010, 3:26pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

In March, we learned that there is some dilution of PageRank when 301ed from another URL. That means, if I have PageRank on example.com/page1.html and I redirect that page to example.com/page2.html, most but not all of the PageRank from example.com/page1.html will pass to example.com/page2.html. This was contrary to what most people felt was really happening. Most people felt that 100% of the PageRank would ultimately pass form one URL to the next if a 301 redirect was used. So now maybe 99%?

There is some early and new chatter buzzing around the SEO forums that since either MayDay or the Caffeine launch, that even less PageRank and/or link popularity is passing through 301 redirected URLs.

I spotted through threads with this speculation going on, one at Google Webmaster Help and WebmasterWorld. We have two different people asking, I'll quote both:

What I have noticed since the MayDay update is that the 301 redirects dont seem to pass through as much link juice anymore.

Did the May Day Update reduce the amount of LinkJuice that gets passed through 301 redirects???
A lot of web masters on different forums are saying that, and I was wondering if the regulars on this forum felt the same way.

This may be one of those wild theories but sometimes these wild theories come out to be true. And when they come out to be true, either Google says so, doesn't say so or fixes a bug and admits fault.

Do you think there is anything to this theory?

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help and WebmasterWorld.

Word "Google" In Google Places Submission Put You In A Manual Review

Posted: August 6th, 2010, 3:19pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

I often see people complaining that it takes too long for their Google Places verified listing to show up or be approved on Google Maps. In some cases, Google will place certain submissions into a holding pattern so a Googler can manually review.

I believe one of those areas is the category of locksmith. For some reason, locksmiths try to abuse Google Maps.

Today, I learned a new, but in hindsight, obvious reason to be placed in a hold for manual review. Using the word "Google" anywhere in your listing will place your listing on hold for a manual review. What is funny is even using the the email address, google@mydomain.com would put you on hold.

Joel H from Google said in a Google Places Help thread:

If you're curious why you where flagged: using the term 'google' requires extra review. You added email address google@yourdomains.com which caused the listings to be flagged. I understand why people use these unique email addresses, but we do check up on its usage in listings. This can be a problem when folks put tracking parameters in URLs with 'google' in them too.
I hope you understand why it was flagged, but I want to be clear, we should have been more responsive, and I'm taking that feedback back to the team to help alleviate this issue for other users.

So, don't submit with a google@ email or stick google in your tracking parameters or elsewhere if you want faster approval.

Forum discussion at Google Places Help.

Google Doesn't Use Alexa Data For Sitelinks or PageRank

Posted: August 6th, 2010, 3:14pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

I spotted a funny but yet basic SEO concept in a Google Webmaster Help thread.

One webmaster asked, and I quote:

It true that Get sitelinks from Google is directly related to traffic of alexa.com

The first flag that this is a poor question is that I had to edit several typos in the question itself.

The second flag is that a Googler comes in and gives a straight forward answer, as opposed to tip-toeing around the response.

JohnMu from Google clearly said, no! He said:

Just to be very clear: Alexa's metrics do not play a role in whether or not Sitelinks are shown for a site for a specific query.

There you have it - a clear, very clear, response from Google on Alexa's role at Google, or lack there of.

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

Can't Update Your Google Places Business Info Using Internet Explorer

Posted: August 6th, 2010, 3:04pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

If you try to update your Google Places (business listing) listing on Google Maps using Internet Explorer, you may run into an issue.

A Google Places Help thread has confirmed reports of an issue that prevents certain versions of Internet Explorer from updating their business listings in Google Places.

The first report came three days ago, and Joel from Google confirmed the bug saying:

Thanks for letting us know. This issue may be unique to Internet Explorer. We're currently looking into a fix now. You can consider it a known issue at this point. It may take us a bit to put a fix into the product. For now, the best work around mentioned is to use another browser (people have reported success with Chrome & Firefox).
I'm going to merge other threads with this one.

We already can reproduce the issue in Internet Explorer 7. If folks see it in other browsers, please let us know.

I personally tried it on Internet Explorer 8 and it worked fine for me. If that doesn't work, download Firefox or Chrome until Google fixes this issue.

Forum discussion at Google Places Help.

New Google AdWords Advertisers Can't Use Direct Debit Option

Posted: August 6th, 2010, 3:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdWords

Those of you signing up for Google AdWords for the first time, or setting up a brand new account, can not currently use Direct Debit option for payment.

A Google AdWords Help thread has Googler, Bindu confirming this as a known issue. Bindu said it won't be fixed for a few weeks:

We are aware that currently new advertisers signing-up for AdWords are unable to choose Direct Debit as a form of payment. Please note that this payment option is only temporarily unavailable for new sign-ups. We have escalated this to our engineers who’re working to resolve this on high priority.
This issue should be resolved in a few weeks. As a workaround, you may choose any other forms of payments.

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 5, 2010

Posted: August 5th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

How To Sell Links On Your Web Site

Posted: August 5th, 2010, 3:42pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Link Building

A WebmasterWorld has discussion around a topic I don't think I ever covered... How does one sell links on their web site without getting penalized? Of course, you can nofollow the links but what about not nofollowing them?

First bet is to not do what we do here, because we are penalized. :)

But what can you do to sell links to sites, make some cash on the side and not be impacted by Google's almightily PageRank penalties? The thread has a few suggestions including:

(1) Make sure to always control the link text and URL manually
(2) Only link to relevant sites
(3) Link to sites that don't seem banned or sketchy
(4) Do long term link sales, so it is less of a rotating ad network
(5) Site wide foot links or side bar links are a red flag
(6) Don't advertise the links are for sale

I think I can go on and on, so feel free to add your own or discussion.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Google's Norvig: Most Popular Result First, Then A Diverse Result Second

Posted: August 5th, 2010, 3:30pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Slate published an article named Error Message: Google Research Director Peter Norvig on Being Wrong and a lot of people are talking about his philosophy on Google and him being wrong. Cool!

But he did lay down some tidbits on Google's ranking algorithm. Let me share them with you. One of the more interesting quotes, for me, is:

Yeah, that's always a problem. One way we try to counter that is diversity. We haven't figured out any way to get around majority rules, so we want to show the most popular result first, but then after that, for the second one, you don't want something that's almost the same as the first. You prefer some diversity, so there's where minority views start coming in.

So for the first search result, Google is looking for the "most popular" result to place first. Not necessarily the most relevant or the best match, but most popular. Great, so how about the second result, is that the second most popular result? No! Instead it is a diverse result, something that differs because "you don't want something that's almost the same as the first," Norvig said.

As Tedster points out in the WebmasterWorldthread discussing this, he sees this often and this is where Query Deserves Diversity comes in.

Another interesting quote revolves around real importance of PageRank:

It sounds like page rank uses consensus as a stand-in for credibility. That slippage is hardly unique to Google-all of us use consensus as a stand-in for credibility sometimes-but it can be pretty misleading.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld& Google Blogoscoped Forums.

Google Allowing Bidding & Text Usage of Keywords in UK, Canadian & Irish AdWords Ads

Posted: August 5th, 2010, 3:19pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdWords

The Google AdWords Blog announced that UK, Canadian and Irish AdWords advertisers can soon begin bidding on and using trademarked keywords in their ad copy. This complies with the change Google made to their trademark policy in the US in May 2009.

U.K., Canadian, Irish, U.S. and many other countries can now:

(1) Bid on trademarked keywords
(2) Use the trademark word in their ad copy.

There are of course limitations:

Ads using the term in a competitive, critical, or negative way will not be allowed to run with the term at issue in their ad. Additionally, we will not allow the following:

ads that do not lead to a landing page that clearly facilitates the sale of either the goods and services corresponding to the trademark or parts or components related to the goods and services corresponding to the trademark
competitive or critical information about the goods and services corresponding to a trademark
ads that do not lead to a landing page which provides substantive information about the goods and services corresponding to a trademark

When AdWords announced this in the U.S., we ran a poll and we saw that most advertisers liked the policy change. I am not sure if the UK advertisers feel the same.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 4, 2010

Posted: August 4th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Google: "Probably Possible" 3rd Party Bad Links Can Hurt You

Posted: August 4th, 2010, 3:49pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Time after time, Google has said spam links can't hurt you. Google said it a bunch of times, competitors can't hurt you, but most SEOs do not believe that.

I spotted a new thread at Google Webmaster Help where Google is somewhat changing their tune to this claim.

JohnMu of Google said "theoretically, it's probably possible" that competitors can use links to hurt your rankings. Of course, John said it is extremely unlikely, adding:

But in practice, we have a lot of safeguards that help our algorithms to evaluate sites in useful ways. Our algorithms are pretty complex, it takes more than a handful of bad links to sway their opinion of a website. Even if Webmaster Tools shows a million links, then that's not going to change things if those links are all ignored for ranking purposes.

But this is one of the first times I have seen a Googler say, it is "probably possibile" for a competitor to use links to hurt a site. Of course, SEOs believe it was possible, right?

Take my poll, do you think a competitor can hurt your site in Google by using spam links?

Can Spam Links By Competitors Hurt You In Google?Market Research

This post is timely because someone tried this to my corporate site Sunday night. You can read that story at RustyBrick's blog. Personally, I am not worried about my site taking a dive in Google from this spam attack - but maybe I am naive.

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

Tim Mayer Leaves Yahoo, Kinda Like Matt Cutts Leaving Google

Posted: August 4th, 2010, 3:37pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Engine

Yesterday, Tim Mayer of Yahoo tweeted that he is no longer at Yahoo.

.bbpBox20261684895 {background:url(http://s.twimg.com/a/1280874693/images/themes/theme1/bg.png) #9AE4E8;padding:20px;} p.bbpTweet{background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block}

Finishing up my first day post-Yahoo: Was very busy today- need to make time for a long bike ride tomorrowless than a minute ago via web Tim Mayer
timmayer

Tim Mayer, if you don't know him, was like the Matt Cutts of Google but to Yahoo. I first sat down to chat with him one on one at a PubCon in 2004. He is a great guy, well respected in the industry and as Danny described he practically worked at every search engine out there.

Tim was responsible for launching Site Explorer, the No Yahoo Directory tag, spoke at many conferences, hosted a radio show on WebmasterRadio.FM and so much more.

I guess since Yahoo is out of the search game, there is no purpose for him to be there now. But it is sad to see him not with a search engine. Well, he may be at a search engine, but he didn't say which yet.

We asked the question, what if Matt Cutts left Google? Well, what if Tim Mayer left Yahoo? Well, there is no Yahoo Search anymore - so I guess there is the answer.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Google AdWords Fixes Search Volume API Bug

Posted: August 4th, 2010, 3:32pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdWords

A bug reported about 40 days ago has finally been fixed by Google. The bug was specific to the AdWords API not returning search volume data for certain months. The report was in the Google AdWords API Form and said:

We are using TARGETED_MONTHLY_SEARCHES to obtain the search volume in each of the last 12 months, and it returns search volumes for June 2009 up to March 2010, but it doesn't return anything for April and May 2010.

Several users of the API were left stranded for all that time. One said, "My company also relies on this data. I hope this is taken as high priority." Google did continually come in to tell people they were aware of the issue and engineers are trying to fix it.

The fix came August 2nd, Eric from the Google AdWords API team wrote:

This problem has been resolved, and there is now search volume available through June. Let me know if you see other unexpected gaps in search volume information.

Forum discussion at Google AdWords API Form.

Google Citing MayDay Update For Poor Google Rankings

Posted: August 4th, 2010, 3:21pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

We all know a heck of a lot about the latest large Google Algorithm update named May Day or MayDay. If not, click those links to learn about it.

Colin McDermott pointed me to a Google Webmaster Help thread where a Googler, JohnMu, is using May Day as an excuse for why a particular site does not rank well.

John said:

It looks like the changes you're seeing here may be from an algorithmic change. As part of our recent algorithmic changes (which the outside world sometimes refers to as the "May Day update" because it happened primarily in May), our algorithms are assessing the site differently.
This is a ranking change, not any sort of manual spam penalty. You can hear more about this change in Matt's video at [www.youtube.com].

Working on making sure that your site is of a high-quality and has unique and compelling content is certainly a good idea, and something I would always recommend working on, regardless of the site's current standing.

I don't know if this is the first time a Googler cited MayDay as the reason behind a particular site not ranking well, but it is always interesting to see this.

Of course, this May Day response isn't all that helpful for all webmasters. The webmaster replied:

I have been working like mad on the site, writing lots of new unique content and getting rid of the bulk of the duplicate content, I have noticed a few pages appearing today, I really hope that this is the start of things returning to normal for us, as I am sure you can appreciate this has had a devastating affect on our business.

I have been working up until 11.00 most evenings adding informative text to each page and I now think that nearly every page on my site has unique content. I submitted a reconsideration request and heard back to say that this had been processed, I have also had the DNS errors fixed.

With this, time and constant content and linking is the solution. So there is really no quick fix.

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

Yes, Yahoo Slurp Is Still Active

Posted: August 4th, 2010, 3:05pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Optimization

A WebmasterWorld thread asks if Yahoo's crawler, Yahoo Slurp is still active. As we know, Yahoo has begun testing Bing powered Yahoo search results and may transition completely over as soon as this month.

But what will happen with Yahoo's crawler? Ultimately, I believe it will go away. But right now it is active. I see it in my logs and so do other webmasters.

So what will happen with Yahoo Site Explorer? Will it continue to exist? If so, will the data go stale? Will it be migrated over to Bing? Bing's new webmaster tools currently has no link reporting tool.

As you can imagine, this leaves some SEOs a bit concerned. There are alternatives, but many loved Yahoo Site Explorer. Yahoo Site Explorer was really a revolutionary tool in the industry, launching in September 2005 under Tim Mayer's leadership (who we will talk about a bit later today).

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Daily Search Forum Recap: August 3, 2010

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

August 2010 Google Webmaster Report

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 4:02pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google PageRankSERP Updates

It is that time of the month, where we give you an update on what is going on with Google in terms of SEO related updates. The last update was in July 2010 and here is our August report.

This post is always based off of a WebmasterWorld thread. This time, Tedster, the WebmasterWorld administrator, has made my life easy by summarizing the most significant discussions in the Google forum. He said there is more talk about the -950 over optimization penalty, reports of rankings going up but traffic going down, traffic cycles between poorly-targeted and well-targeted, even though the total stays level, rankings are lost after a template change, even though textual content and URLs do not change and traffic fluctuates wildly during the day, or from day to day.

Outside of those discussions, here are some of the more significant Google stories from this past month.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Bing Shopping Now Free & Forums Open Up

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 3:44pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Microsoft MSN Search

Brian Smith was the first that I know of to report that Bing Shopping is now free for merchants to sign up with and list their products.

Brian Smith runs SingleFeed, a shopping search engine merchant feed service, that does what the name promises.

As I mentioned in my Search Engine Land piece, Bing Shopping was fee based and they changed the page to say it was free. There is also a PDF with more details.

As you know, Bing's Cashback program discontinued on July 31st. Bing quietly, I still don't see an announcement, is allowing merchants to submit their products to Bing Shopping for free now. The merchant submission form is over here. Again, I am not sure why they are keeping this so hush hush or if I missed an announcement from them.

They do have a forum dedicated to Bing Shopping Help. Carolyn Miller from Microsoft said in one thread:

Welcome to the Bing Shopping forum!
This forum is designed for merchants wishing to collaborate on best practices and ideas for the Bing Shopping program.

Carolyn Miller

adCenter Community Team PM

Forum discussion at Bing Shopping Help.

Linking To Internal 404 Pages Can Cause Search Ranking Harm

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 3:37pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Optimization

An excellent WebmasterWorld thread has one webmaster who noticed he was accidentally linking to thousands of 404ed internal pages. He believes due to that issue, his site's rankings have degraded in Google.

To me, it doesn't sound far-fetched. I wouldn't call this a penalty, but rather a major internal linking issue. Internal linking is important for many reasons, two of which include giving search engines a way to discover your content and showing them what your content is about using anchor text. If you link to pages that don't exist, well - that cannot help you or the search engine. Forget the importance of using internal linking for other reasons, discovery is the basic purpose.

PageOnResults in the forum also added his personal experience with such an issue:

I have personally experienced a degradation in rankings due to a 404 mishap. The site has approximately 1,000 documents. After launching a new application, we discovered a bug in the rewrite that caused Googlebot to index 1,000+ documents that were returning a 404. Unfortunately we did not catch this in a timely manner and sure enough, not long after, we started to lose organic traffic.
Since we are in a very controlled environment, we were able to determine that the loss in organic traffic was a direct result of the 404 issues. After correcting the rewrite, traffic returned to normal within 30 days and actually improved a little thereafter.

It happens, and you can recover.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Sphinn Threads Make Their Way on Search Engine Land

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 3:26pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: SEO Forum News

If you visit Search Engine Land and scroll down and look on the right hand side, you will see a box named "Hot At Sphinn." Yep, Search Engine Land's social sharing site, Sphinn, now has more of a presence on the Search Engine Land site.

Not only that, but weekly, there will be a Hot on Sphinn post on Search Engine Land promoting the best posts on Sphinn.

Matt McGee announced this on the Sphinn blog. Matt said:

Obviously, we're hoping this helps Sphinn gain some more exposure among Search Engine Land readers - and we're also hoping it rewards you for sharing great content on Sphinn. (Not to mention the little extra SEO benefit from the inbound links that will flow to the original authors/articles.)

Forum discussion at Sphinn.

SEO News » Items by rustybrick

Feeds

Items by rustybrick

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 4:03pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Microsoft MSN Search

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:46pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:39pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: SEO Forum News

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:27pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 3:21pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 2:58pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdWords

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 3:28pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Marketing

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 3:17pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 3:06pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 2:43pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Posted: September 1st, 2010, 2:35pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 3:54pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Optimization

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 3:41pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 3:28pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Spam

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:50pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Yahoo Search Engine

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:44pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:29pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:20pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:14pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: August 25th, 2010, 3:03pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Search Engine

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:53pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:47pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:37pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Microsoft MSN Search

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:26pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdWords

Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:17pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Posted: August 23rd, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Posted: August 23rd, 2010, 3:57pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 11:00pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Forum Recap

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 8:50pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Buzz RoundUp

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 3:24pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google Optimization

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 3:13pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Google AdSense

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 3:03pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Other Google Topics

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 2:55pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Microsoft MSN Search

Posted: August 20th, 2010, 2:45pm CEST by rustybrick

Tags: Search Engine Strategies 2010 San